These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7372945)

  • 1. The effect of reinforcement and verbal rehearsal on selective attention in learning-disabled children.
    Dawson MM; Hallahan DP; Reeve RE; Ball DW
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1980 Mar; 8(1):133-44. PubMed ID: 7372945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of increased incentive on free recall by learning-disabled and nondisabled children.
    Bauer RH; Peller-Porth V
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Oct; 117(4):447-61. PubMed ID: 2286838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing the spelling performance of learning disabled students. Task variation does not increase the efficacy of directed rehearsal.
    Singh NN; Farquhar S; Hewett AE
    Behav Modif; 1991 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 2039435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of rehearsal activity and level of word processing on learning disabled and normal readers' free recall.
    Swanson L
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Jan; 108(1st Half):61-72. PubMed ID: 6834018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental recall lag in learning-disabled children: perceptual deficit or verbal mediation deficiency?
    Swanson HL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1979 Jun; 7(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 469113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allocation of study time and recall by learning disabled and nondisabled children of different ages.
    Bauer RH; Newman DR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Aug; 52(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 1890380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The selective attention of learning-disabled children: three studies.
    Copeland AP; Reiner EM
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1984 Sep; 12(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 6747123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing motor imagery and verbal rehearsal strategies in children's ability to follow spoken instructions.
    Yang TX; Allen RJ; Waterman AH; Zhang SY; Su XM; Chan RCK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Mar; 203():105033. PubMed ID: 33278801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: a developmental lag.
    Tarver SG; Hallahan DP; Kauffman JM; Ball DW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1976 Dec; 22(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 993720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Executive processing differences between learning-disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children.
    Swanson HL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1990 Oct; 18(5):549-63. PubMed ID: 2266225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-successive selective attention for learning disabled and normal boys.
    Willis WG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):496-8. PubMed ID: 4069914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between cognitive tempo and selective attention in learning disabled children.
    Heins ED; Hallahan DP; Tarver SG; Kauffman JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):233-4. PubMed ID: 943760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do children use different forms of verbal rehearsal in serial picture recall tasks? A multi-method study.
    Poloczek S; Henry LA; Messer DJ; Büttner G
    Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):758-771. PubMed ID: 30606089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rehearsal strategies and recall performance in boys with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    O'Neill ME; Douglas VI
    J Pediatr Psychol; 1996 Feb; 21(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 8820074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehearsal dynamics in elementary school children.
    Lehmann M; Hasselhorn M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Mar; 111(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 22196371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of hemispatial and asymmetrically focused attention on dichotic listening with normal and learning-disabled children.
    Boliek CA; Obrzut JE; Shaw D
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(3):417-33. PubMed ID: 3374801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of encoding and retrieval strategies on the recall of learning disabled and normal children.
    Moe GL; Harris JD
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Oct; 109(2d Half):233-46. PubMed ID: 6644279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average, and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities.
    Swanson HL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1989 Jun; 47(3):370-97. PubMed ID: 2738511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of instructional set on Bender recall performance of learning disabled and normal children.
    Sczechowicz E; Hinrichsen JJ
    J Pers Assess; 1980 Oct; 44(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 7431195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Free recall and rehearsal strategies in average and severely disabled readers.
    Bauserman DN; Obrzut JE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):539-45. PubMed ID: 7255066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.