BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7372979)

  • 1. Patient response to hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.
    Harris MG; Azevedo LM; Milla A; Sugimura J; Young K
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Mar; 51(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 7372979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual astigmatism and visual acuity with hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.
    Harris MG; Goldberg T; McBride D; Thromburg L
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Mar; 50(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 448008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient response to thin hydrogel contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sarver MD; Polse KA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1977 Mar; 48(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 864184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lacrimal lens effects in Bausch and Lomb Soflens contact lens wear.
    Hutchinson RN
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Mar; 50(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 448009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal edema with hydrogel lenses and eye closure: effect of oxygen transmissibility.
    Sarver MD; Baggett DA; Harris MG; Louie K
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 May; 58(5):386-92. PubMed ID: 7258289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
    Dillehay SM; Miller MB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear.
    Alba-Bueno F; Beltran-Masgoret A; Sanjuan C; Biarnés M; Marín J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 19181564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral corneal erosion due to retail purchase of unfitted prescription contact lenses: a case report.
    Tseng SS; Yang WW; Hsiao JC
    Cornea; 2008 Dec; 27(10):1179-81. PubMed ID: 19034137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses.
    Lebow KA; Schachet JL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 14555895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK.
    Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL; De Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):884-8. PubMed ID: 18772724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Daily disposed hydrogel lenses--a comparison with biweekly replacement.
    Snyder C; Hammack GG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Mar; 65(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8201166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial.
    Sankaridurg PR; Sweeney DF; Holden BA; Naduvilath T; Velala I; Gora R; Krishnamachary M; Rao GN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2327-34. PubMed ID: 14644714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for bullous keratoplasty.
    Lim N; Vogt U
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep; 32(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 16974160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What have pre- and postapproval studies shown about contact lens-related inflammatory events?
    Chalmers RL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 2):388-91; discussion 399-400. PubMed ID: 17975428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
    Riley C; Young G; Chalmers R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative assessment of corneal and refractive stability in soft contact lens wearing photorefractive candidates.
    Ng LT; Lee EM; Nguyen AL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 17502823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of wavefront aberrations in eyes wearing different types of soft contact lenses.
    Jiang H; Wang D; Yang L; Xie P; He JC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):769-74. PubMed ID: 17041323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.