260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7373734)
1. Protecting and informing human research subjects.
Check WA
JAMA; 1980 May 23-30; 243(20):1985-6, 1988, 1993. PubMed ID: 7373734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Made in the U.S.A.: legal and ethical issues in artificial heart experimentation.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):164-71. PubMed ID: 3645227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal agency's final rule says informed consent forms must be dated.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11655034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review boards.
Waggoner WC
Clin Dermatol; 1991; 9(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 1822404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects.
Bosso JA
Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):828-34. PubMed ID: 6641508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent for biomedical research in acute care medicine.
Spivey WH; Abramson NS; Iserson KV; MacKay CR; Cohen MP
Ann Emerg Med; 1991 Nov; 20(11):1251-65. PubMed ID: 1952317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
