These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Myoelectric control of multifunctional hand prostheses-a clinical evaluation]. Almström C; Herberts P Lakartidningen; 1980 Feb; 77(9):768-70, 774. PubMed ID: 7374296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Stein RB; Walley M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A myoelectric prosthesis for the forearm amputee]. Martins FL; Martins LS; Davin P Acta Med Port; 1989; 2(6):297-301. PubMed ID: 2696333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptation of the VA / USMC electric hand to the Liberty Mutual myoelectric Boston elbow for above-elbow amputees. Leal JM; Williams TW; Malone JM Bull Prosthet Res; 1981; 10-35():56-60. PubMed ID: 7332835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body schema and body awareness of amputees. Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities. Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees. Weaver SA; Lange LR; Vogts VM Am J Occup Ther; 1988 Feb; 42(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3348341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability of the NYU Number 1 Child-sized Body-powered Hand. New York University. Krebs DE; Lembeck W; Fishman S Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3341895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myoelectric prosthetic replacement in the upper-extremity amputee. Dalsey R; Gomez W; Seitz WH; Dick HM; Hutnick G; Akdeniz R Orthop Rev; 1989 Jun; 18(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 2664671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Myoelectric prostheses for kindergarten age children. Analysis of first reactions and experiences]. Egermann M; Thomsen M Orthopade; 2003 Feb; 32(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 12607082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Practicing for the use of myoelectric prostheses in children with congenital forearm stumps]. Soerjanto R Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1974 Jul; 118(27):1042-9. PubMed ID: 4841537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Results in forearm prostheses (author's transl)]. Finkbeiner GF Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1975 Oct; 113(5):933-7. PubMed ID: 1202800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency. James MA; Bagley AM; Brasington K; Lutz C; McConnell S; Molitor F J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88(11):2356-65. PubMed ID: 17079391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseball adaptation for below-elbow prosthesis. Truong XT; Erickson R; Galbreath R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Jun; 67(6):418. PubMed ID: 3718201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]