These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7375919)

  • 1. Peer review: an experiment.
    Harnad S
    Science; 1980 May; 208(4447):974, 976. PubMed ID: 7375919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Support for peer review.
    Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
    Kirschstein RL
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assuring quality peer review.
    Laney WR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 9509775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence of sexism in peer review.
    Grant J; Burden S; Breen G
    Nature; 1997 Dec; 390(6659):438. PubMed ID: 9393992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance].
    Kudaiberdieva G
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journal peer review. The need for a research agenda.
    Bailar JC; Patterson K
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):654-7. PubMed ID: 3974641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is peer review in crisis?
    Mulligan A
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nothing to hide.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):541. PubMed ID: 16738696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducing data.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Jun; 8(6):541. PubMed ID: 16738697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Malice's wonderland: research funding and peer review.
    Osmond DH
    J Neurobiol; 1983 Mar; 14(2):95-112. PubMed ID: 6842193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.