These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7376266)

  • 1. The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and palpation in early detection of breast cancer.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Giannardi G; Villari N
    Tumori; 1980 Feb; 66(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 7376266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reasons for failure of physical examination in breast cancer detection (analysis of 232 false-negative cases).
    Cardona G; Cataliotti L; Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Tumori; 1983 Dec; 69(6):531-7. PubMed ID: 6665876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The anatomy of missed breast cancers.
    Reintgen D; Berman C; Cox C; Baekey P; Nicosia S; Greenberg H; Bush C; Lyman GH; Clark RA
    Surg Oncol; 1993; 2(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 8252194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial.
    Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Shiiba K; Ohnuki K; Fukao A; Abe R; Matsuno S; Mori S
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1995 May; 86(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 7790323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk.
    Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Bartels CC; Obdeijn AI; Oudkerk M
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Mar; 36(4):514-9. PubMed ID: 10717529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scintimammographic analysis of nonpalpable breast lesions previously identified by conventional mammography.
    Tolmos J; Cutrone JA; Wang B; Vargas HI; Stuntz M; Mishkin FS; Diggles LE; Venegas RJ; Klein SR; Khalkhali I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 9625173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of multimedial diagnosis of breast cancer in women below 36 year of age.
    Ciatto S; Brancato B
    Radiol Med; 2005 Apr; 109(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 15883517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mass screening for early breast cancer detection.
    Cappellini M; Ciatto S; Maltoni G
    Tumori; 1978 Oct; 64(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 746595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False alarms of breast cancer.
    Devitt JE
    Lancet; 1989 Nov; 2(8674):1257-8. PubMed ID: 2573767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical diagnosis of early breast cancer].
    Ueno E; Tohno E; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Aiyoshi Y; Morishima I; Ishikawa T; Fukasawa M; Yazawa T; Yashiro T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():140-7. PubMed ID: 8037476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonpalpable breast lesions: accuracy of prebiopsy mammographic diagnosis.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Krivisky B; Bier S; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 3659350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.
    Osako T; Iwase T; Takahashi K; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
    Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 17690501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection.
    Park BW; Kim SI; Kim MH; Kim EK; Park SH; Lee KS
    Yonsei Med J; 2000 Jun; 41(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 10957884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stratification of palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer by method of detection and age.
    Perdue PW; Galbo C; Ghosh BC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Nov; 2(6):512-5. PubMed ID: 8591081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.