These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7377198)

  • 1. Effect of an infection surveillance and control program on the accuracy of retrospective chart review.
    Haley RW; Hooton TM; Schoenfelder JR; Crossley KB; Quade D; Stanley RC; Culver DH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):543-55. PubMed ID: 7377198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of retrospective chart review in measuring nosocomial infection rates. Results of validation studies in pilot hospitals.
    Haley RW; Schaberg DR; McClish DK; Quade D; Crossley KB; Culver DH; Morgan WM; McGowan JE; Shachtman RH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):516-33. PubMed ID: 7377196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SENIC Project. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project). Summary of study design.
    Haley RW; Quade D; Freeman HE; Bennett JV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):472-85. PubMed ID: 6246798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of method error on the power of a statistical test. Implications of imperfect sensitivity and specificity in retrospective chart review.
    Whaley FS; Quade D; Haley RW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):534-42. PubMed ID: 7377197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The "hospital epidemiologist" in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977: a description of the head of the infection surveillance and control program. Report from the SENIC project.
    Haley RW
    Infect Control; 1980; 1(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 6915009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General comments on the study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project).
    Eickhoff TC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 6246797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of generic quality improvement chart review to recognize nosocomial infection.
    Buchanan-Chell M; Taylor G
    Am J Infect Control; 1992 Dec; 20(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 1492695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project): results and implications for the future.
    Hughes JM
    Chemotherapy; 1988; 34(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 3243099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The emergence of infection surveillance and control programs in US hospitals: an assessment, 1976.
    Haley RW; Shachtman RH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):574-91. PubMed ID: 6990750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress report on the evaluation of the efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs.
    Haley RW; Culver DH; Emori TG; Hooton TM; White JW
    Am J Med; 1981 Apr; 70(4):971-5. PubMed ID: 7211933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnostic training for the surveillance of nosocomial infections: what is possible and significant?].
    Gastmeier P; Geffers C; Daschner F; Rüden H
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1998 Jun; 201(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 9686445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for classifying patients according to the nosocomial infection risks associated with diagnoses and surgical procedures.
    Hooton TM; Haley RW; Culver DH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1980 May; 111(5):556-73. PubMed ID: 7377199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.
    Wingo PA; Ory HW; Layde PM; Lee NC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 3381827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two retrospective active surveillance methods for the detection of nosocomial infection in surgical patients.
    Belío-Blasco C; Torres-Fernández-Gil MA; Echeverría-Echarri JL; Gómez-López LI
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2000 Jan; 21(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10656350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National survey of the status of infection surveillance and control programs in acute care hospitals with more than 300 beds in the Republic of Korea.
    Oh HS; Chung HW; Kim JS; Cho SI
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 May; 34(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 16679181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of frequency of chart review on the sensitivity of nosocomial infection surveillance in general surgery.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Gómez-Ortega A; Sierra A; Dierssen T; Llorca J; Sillero-Arenas M
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 10100551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nosocomial data collection, making it meaningful. Part 2: Interfacing infection control with other surveillance systems.
    Chavigny KH
    Infect Control Urol Care; 1982; 7(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 6923857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and application of evaluation indices for hospital infection surveillance and control programs in the Republic of Korea.
    Oh HS; Cheong HW; Yi SE; Kim H; Choe KW; Cho SI
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 17385150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surveillance strategies: a primer.
    Abrutyn E; Talbot GH
    Infect Control; 1987 Nov; 8(11):459-64. PubMed ID: 2828261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The usefulness of a conceptual model in the study of the efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs.
    Haley RW
    Rev Infect Dis; 1981; 3(4):775-80. PubMed ID: 7339792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.