BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 737848)

  • 1. A scheme for the evaluation of methods in clinical chemistry with particular application to those measuring enzyme activities. Part I: general considerations.
    Kim EK; Logan JE
    Clin Biochem; 1978 Dec; 11(6):238-43. PubMed ID: 737848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scheme for the evaluation of methods in clinical chemistry with particular application to those measuring enzyme activities. Part II: analysis of data and performance assessment.
    Kim EK; Logan JE
    Clin Biochem; 1978 Dec; 11(6):244-50. PubMed ID: 737849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revised recommendation (1983) on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part 2. Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical chemistry kits.
    Logan JE
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1983 Dec; 21(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 6663250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revised recommendation (1983) on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part 1. Recommendations for specifications on labelling of clinical laboratory materials.
    Logan JE
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1983 Dec; 21(12):893-8. PubMed ID: 6663249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A recommended scheme for the evaluation of kits in the clinical laboratory.
    Percy-Robb IW; Broughton PM; Jennings RD; McCormack JJ; Neill DW; Saunders RA; Warner M
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1980 Sep; 17(5):217-26. PubMed ID: 7447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External quality assessment of steroid hormone assays in the United Kingdom.
    Middle JG
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 1809065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of Class II Common Problems in the Registration of
    Yang X; Dong Q; Zhu W; Zhen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 44(6):537-540. PubMed ID: 33314864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revised recommendation (1983) on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part 2. Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical chemistry kits. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry.
    Logan JE
    Clin Chim Acta; 1984 Mar; 137(3):381F-386F. PubMed ID: 6697539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishing a reference system in clinical enzymology.
    Panteghini M; Ceriotti F; Schumann G; Siekmann L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Sep; 39(9):795-800. PubMed ID: 11601675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical validation of reagent lot change in the clinical chemistry laboratory can confer insights on good clinical laboratory practice.
    Cho MC; Kim SY; Jeong TD; Lee W; Chun S; Min WK
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2014 Nov; 51(Pt 6):688-94. PubMed ID: 24497612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy-based assessment of proficiency testing results with serum from single donations: possibilities and limitations.
    Stöckl D; Libeer JC; Reinauer H; Thienpont LM; De Leenheer AP
    Clin Chem; 1996 Mar; 42(3):469-70. PubMed ID: 8598118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Centralization of multisite reagent lot-to-lot validation for Ortho Clinical Vitros chemistry instruments.
    To M; Raizman JE; Goudreau BL; Higgins T; Brun M; Tsui AKY
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Nov; 97():62-66. PubMed ID: 34343576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Can laboratories rely on diagnostics-companies?].
    Ekman R; Fernlund P; Forberg R; Isaksson A; Lindstedt G; Hellsing K; Hård L; Nyström E
    Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2783. PubMed ID: 10900904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement of serum cholinesterase activity: comparison of commercial and laboratory test reagents, enzyme standards and statistical processing of the results].
    Simeon V
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 1989 Jun; 40(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 2633723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with cost-effective in-house reagents for the assay of carbamazepine in serum, using the Abbott TDx.
    Colbert DL; Turner GJ
    Ther Drug Monit; 1993 Jun; 15(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 8333000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commutability limitations influence quality control results with different reagent lots.
    Miller WG; Erek A; Cunningham TD; Oladipo O; Scott MG; Johnson RE
    Clin Chem; 2011 Jan; 57(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 21097677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of five enzymic kits for determination of triglyceride concentrations in plasma.
    Walker RE; Bachorik PS; Kwiterovich PO
    Clin Chem; 1982 Nov; 28(11):2299-305. PubMed ID: 7127778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Report on a common survey in clinical laboratories in Belgium and in The Netherlands: immunoassays.
    Libeer JC; Tertoolen JF
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 212():39-42. PubMed ID: 8465152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Scientific Committee, Analytical Section. IFCC/WHO principles and recommendations on evaluation of diagnostic reagent sets used in health laboratories with limited resources. Part 3. Selection and evaluation using reference materials. General considerations.
    Logan JE; Bayse DD; Koedam JC; Mather A; Wilding P
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Aug; 22(8):573-82. PubMed ID: 6491619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to deal with semi-quantitative tests? Application of an ordinal scale model to measurements of urine glucose.
    Petersen PH; Christensen NG; Sandberg S; Nordin G; Pedersen M;
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2009; 69(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 19499483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.