These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7379613)

  • 1. Children's rights after the supreme court's decision on Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Frank CC
    Child Welfare; 1980 Jun; 59(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 7379613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
    Tiano LV
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An invitation to the dance: an empirical response to Chief Justice Warren Burger's "time-consuming procedural minuets" theory in Parham v. J.R.
    Perlin ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 7317656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A footnote to Parham: Was J. L. a casualty of the mental health bar?
    Lacoursiere RB
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 6640121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
    Spaulding WJ
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal rights on minors in the health care process I.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1979 Oct; 43(10):669. PubMed ID: 498796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R.
    Herbsleb J
    Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Due process in the "voluntary" civil commitment of juvenile wards.
    Glaessner PO
    J Leg Med; 1981 Jun; 2(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 6972431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
    Joseph BC
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles: civil commitments and the balance of authority between child, parent, and state.
    Martin CA
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Jan; 7(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 11660936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
    Citarella KC
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's rights: a movement in search of meaning.
    Bricker SW
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):661-93. PubMed ID: 11665158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development rights to privacy and independent decision-making.
    Guyer MJ; Harrison SI; Rieveschl JL
    J Am Acad Child Psychiatry; 1982 May; 21(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7096851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
    Butler KA
    Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Historic Supreme Court decision on the voluntary admission of minors issued.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 11665050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.