These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7380401)
1. Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980. Roth LG Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 31(6):385-96. PubMed ID: 7380401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review. Weiner BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision. Reinert RE Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy. Shuman D Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incompetence to refuse treatment: a necessary condition for civil commitment. Lebegue B; Clark LD Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Aug; 138(8):1075-7. PubMed ID: 7258384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential Effects of Hall TS Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history. Behnke SH J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New develpments in civil commitment of the mentally ill. Impact for patient, family, and psychiatrist. Williams PW JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2307-9. PubMed ID: 490828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill. Fields JD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment. Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "May you stay forever young": Robert Sadoff and the history of mental disability law. Perlin ML J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 15985668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment? Linburn GE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision. Kopolow LE Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluations of dangerousness. Kress F Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment. Slovenko R Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):817-26. PubMed ID: 914239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Landmark?: United States Supreme Court recognized the issue of the constitutional rights of civilly committed mental patients. Brown A J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 10246882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The two-edged sword. Smith WB JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2327. PubMed ID: 490835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the committed patient refuse chemotherapy? Malmquist CP Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1979 Mar; 36(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 420550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment. Winthrop LF Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]