These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7381558)

  • 1. Beat-by-beat validation of ECG gating.
    Bacharach SL; Green MV; Borer JS; Ostrow HG; Bonow RO; Farkas SP; Johnston GS
    J Nucl Med; 1980 Apr; 21(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 7381558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of ventricular function by ECG gating during atrial fibrillation.
    Bacharach SL; Green MV; Bonow RO; Findley SL; Ostrow HG; Johnston GS
    J Nucl Med; 1981 Mar; 22(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7205365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of simultaneous measurements of systolic function in the baboon by electromagnetic flowmeter and high frame rate ECG-gated blood pool scintigraphy.
    Green MV; Ostrow HG; Scott RN; Douglas MA; Bailey JJ; Johnston GS
    Circulation; 1979 Aug; 60(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 156093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of gating delays on ejection estimates: concise communication.
    Powers TA; Bowen RD; Price RR; Patton JA
    J Nucl Med; 1982 Jan; 23(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 7054449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of gating modes on the analysis of left ventricular function in the presence of heart rate variation.
    Juni JE; Chen CC
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Jul; 29(7):1272-8. PubMed ID: 3392587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ambulatory ventricular function monitoring for serial assessments of cardiac function during exercise.
    Tamaki N; Strauss HW
    J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 17(4):875-85. PubMed ID: 3506612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First-third ejection fraction: is the first-pass radionuclide method accurate?
    Pierson RN; Yamashina A; Friedman MI; Roistacher N
    J Nucl Med; 1985 Sep; 26(9):994-1001. PubMed ID: 4032056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance characteristics of a commercial ECG gate.
    Graham M; Cavailloles F; Ritchie JL; Williams DL; Hamilton GW
    J Nucl Med; 1980 Apr; 21(4):387-90. PubMed ID: 7381567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum fourier filtering of cardiac data: a minimum-error method: concise communication.
    Bacharach SL; Green MV; Vitale D; White G; Douglas MA; Bonow RO; Larson SM
    J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1176-84. PubMed ID: 6644378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beat-to-beat assessment of left ventricular ejection in atrial fibrillation.
    Benjelloun H; Itti R; Philippe L; Lorgeron JM; Brochier M
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(5):206-10. PubMed ID: 6873096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radionuclide ventriculography. II. Clinical results--parameters of global ventricular function (author's transl)].
    Stauch M; Sigel H; Geffers H; Gerst CM; Bitter F; Adam WE
    Nuklearmedizin; 1978 Oct; 17(5):211-5. PubMed ID: 733589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Determination of left ventricular global ejection fraction using ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography].
    Lackner K; Landwehr P; von Uexküll V; Grube E; Biersack HJ
    Rofo; 1985 Jun; 142(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 2988060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic arrhythmia filtration for gated blood-pool imaging: validation against list mode technique.
    Wallis JW; Wu-Connolly L; Rocchini AP; Juni JE
    J Nucl Med; 1986 Aug; 27(8):1347-52. PubMed ID: 3734907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Disproportionate shortening of left ventricular diastolic duration in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy].
    Plehn G; Vormbrock J; Zühlke C; Christ M; Perings C; Perings S; Trappe HJ; Meissner A
    Med Klin (Munich); 2007 Sep; 102(9):707-13. PubMed ID: 17879008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of protocols in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in gated blood-pool scintigraphy.
    Young KC; Railton R
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Dec; 54(648):1091-3. PubMed ID: 7296235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocardiographic strain pattern and left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study.
    Palmieri V; Okin PM; Bella JN; Wachtell K; Oikarinen L; Gerdts E; Boman K; Nieminen MS; Dahlöf B; Devereux RB
    J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):2079-84. PubMed ID: 16957569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beat-to-beat left ventricular performance assessed from the equilibrium cardiac blood pool using a computerized nuclear probe.
    Berger HJ; Davies RA; Batsford WP; Hoffer PB; Gottschalk A; Zaret BL
    Circulation; 1981 Jan; 63(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 7438387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systolic and diastolic ventricular performance at rest and during exercise in heart transplant recipients.
    Verani MS; George SE; Leon CA; Whisennand HH; Noon GP; Short HD; DeBakey ME; Young JB
    J Heart Transplant; 1988; 7(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 3284985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional iron deficiency and diastolic function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
    Kasner M; Aleksandrov AS; Westermann D; Lassner D; Gross M; von Haehling S; Anker SD; Schultheiss HP; Tschöpe C
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(5):4652-7. PubMed ID: 23968714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.