These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7382914)

  • 1. Evaluation of edge-induced streaking artifacts in CT scanners.
    Sheridan WT; Keller MR; O'Connor CM; Brooks RA; Hanson KM
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 7382914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for correcting bone induced artifacts in computed tomography scanners.
    Joseph PM; Spital RD
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 670461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compton scatter effects in CT reconstructions.
    Glover GH
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 7162472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep-frozen biologic phantom for performance evaluation of CT scanners.
    Moström U; Bergström K; Pech P; Ytterbergh C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(6):1016-24. PubMed ID: 3782540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
    Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artifacts in computed tomography of the posterior fossa: a comparative phantom study.
    Moström U; Ytterbergh C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 3734195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of CT scanners for use in neuroradiology. A study with regard to radiation dose and image quality.
    Moström U
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1988; 372():89-107. PubMed ID: 2979296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metallic artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses on PET images: a PET/CT phantom study using different PET/CT scanners.
    Shimamoto H; Kakimoto N; Fujino K; Hamada S; Shimosegawa E; Murakami S; Furukawa S; Hatazawa J
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 23(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 19399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of CT section thickness by using the partial volume effect.
    Shiraishi J; Tsuda K; Inoue Y; Onoyama Y
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):870-2. PubMed ID: 1509082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of clip localization for different kilovoltage imaging modalities as applied to partial breast irradiation setup.
    Buehler A; Ng SK; Lyatskaya Y; Stsepankou D; Hesser J; Zygmanski P
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):821-34. PubMed ID: 19378743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality and dose in computerized tomography: evaluation of four CT scanners.
    Borasi G; Castellani G; Domenichini R; Franchini M; Granata M; Torresin A; Tosi G
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 6738456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography from ordinary radiographs for teleradiology.
    Rangayyan RM; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):687-90. PubMed ID: 6646077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods.
    Chen B; Christianson O; Wilson JM; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071909. PubMed ID: 24989387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical binary tomography calibration (EBTC) for the precorrection of beam hardening and scatter for flat panel CT.
    Grimmer R; Kachelriess M
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2233-40. PubMed ID: 21626957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a computed tomographic scanner for radiation therapy treatment planning.
    Smith V; Parker DL; Stanley JH; Phillips TL; Boyd DP; Kan PT
    Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 7403528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
    Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal artifact reduction strategies for improved attenuation correction in hybrid PET/CT imaging.
    Abdoli M; Dierckx RA; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3343-60. PubMed ID: 22755716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of 29 EMI CT machines in Britain.
    Speller RD; White DR; Veerappan R; Coleman AJ; Waller PE
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):232-40. PubMed ID: 7470785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation-induced refraction artifacts in the optical CT readout of polymer gel dosimeters.
    Campbell WG; Wells DM; Jirasek A
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112102. PubMed ID: 25370653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.