These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7384208)

  • 21. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
    Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of Monte Carlo simulations for accurate dose determination with thermoluminescence dosemeters in radiation therapy beams.
    Mobit P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):383-6. PubMed ID: 12382773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters to 6-18 keV photons.
    Ahmed AB; Barber DE
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Mar; 34(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 2928389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurements of the optical density and the thermoluminescent response of LiF:Mg,Ti exposed to high doses of 60Co gamma rays.
    Montaño-García C; Gamboa-deBuen I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):230-2. PubMed ID: 16644946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of effectiveness of thermoluminescent crystals LiF:Mg,Ti, and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for clinical dosimetry.
    Harris CK; Elson HR; Lamba MA; Foster AE
    Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1527-9. PubMed ID: 9304583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calculated energy response correction factors for LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters employed in the seventh EULEP dosimetry intercomparison.
    Zoetelief J; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Aug; 42(8):1491-504. PubMed ID: 9279901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. TYPE TESTING OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF Hp(10) AND Hp(0.07).
    Pereira JS; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Caldeira M; Carvalhal G; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 30496554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Energy response of GR-200A thermoluminescence dosemeters to 60Co and to monoenergetic synchrotron radiation in the energy range 28-40 keV.
    Emiro F; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Fedon C; Longo R; Tromba G; Russo P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 25737582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for low dose X-ray measurements.
    Del Sol Fernández S; García-Salcedo R; Sánchez-Guzmán D; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Gaona E; de León-Alfaro MA; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jan; 107():340-345. PubMed ID: 26609683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. FADING EFFECT OF LiF:Mg,Ti AND LiF:Mg,Cu,P Ext-Rad AND WHOLE-BODY DETECTORS.
    Pereira J; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 26503857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of precision thermoluminescence dosimetry for intercomparison of absorbed dose.
    Rossiter MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 1187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
    Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IAEA-WHO cobalt-60 teletherapy dosimetry service using mailed LiF dosemeters. A survey of results obtaining during 1970-75.
    Eisenlohr HH; Jayaraman S
    Phys Med Biol; 1977 Jan; 22(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 840894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
    Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. UV-induced bleaching of deep traps in Harshaw TLD LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Benevides L; Voss S; Nita I; Rotunda J; Velbeck K; Luo LZ; Moscovitch M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):199-201. PubMed ID: 21310735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic removal of electron contamination for 60Co panoramic gamma ray exposure--Investigations with CaSO4:Dy and LiF based dosimeters.
    Kumar M; Sahani G; Chourasiya G
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1173-6. PubMed ID: 20071190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the TL responses of two different preparations of LiF:Mg,Cu,P irradiated by photons of various energies.
    González PR; Furetta C; Azorín J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Mar; 65(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 17085055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.