These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7387149)

  • 41. Adaptation of an automated microbiology system for the growth of anaerobes and performance of antimicrobial susceptibility tests.
    Murray PR; Niles AC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 6291376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Susceptibility testing of fastidious organisms in the API microdilution panel.
    Robinson A; Mortensen JE; LaRocca M
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Apr; 6(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 3495393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microdilution technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Rotilie CA; Fass RJ; Prior RB; Perkins RL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Mar; 7(3):311-15. PubMed ID: 1137383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.
    Kiehn TE; Capitolo C; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 7107862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure.
    Castel O; Grollier G; Agius G; Toullat G; de Rautlin de la Roy Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990 Sep; 9(9):667-71. PubMed ID: 2226495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method.
    Bradford PA; Petersen PJ; Young M; Jones CH; Tischler M; O'Connell J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2005 Sep; 49(9):3903-9. PubMed ID: 16127069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 12173107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Direct method to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing blood pathogens.
    Wegner DL; Mathis CR; Neblett TR
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 May; 9(5):861-2. PubMed ID: 949185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.
    Halebian S; Harris B; Finegold SM; Rolfe RD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 6165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative evaluation of three different commercial blood culture media for recovery of anaerobic organisms.
    Mangels JI; Lindberg LH; Vosti KL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 May; 5(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 874070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Susceptibility testing with anaerobic blood culture isolates. Comparison of a rapid, direct methods with standardized method.
    Murray PR; Christman JL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):558-61. PubMed ID: 6989230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR; de Smet AM; Diederen BM; Kluytmans JA; van Keulen PH
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests for anaerobic bacteria with use of the disk diffusion method.
    Johnson MJ; Thatcher E; Cox ME
    Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S334-6. PubMed ID: 7548590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.
    Chapin KC; Musgnug MC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4751-4. PubMed ID: 14532215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Antibiotic sensitivity testing of anaerobes.
    Phillips I
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1982; 35():31-6. PubMed ID: 6820186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations: rationale for use of selected antimicrobial concentrations.
    Witebsky FG; Maclowry JD; French SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 479358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modified agar dilution method for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Hanson CW; Martin WJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 400819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of medium and inoculum on antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
    Rahimi A; Martin WJ; Washington JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1974 Sep; 62(3):425-7. PubMed ID: 4496770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of broth microdilution susceptibility results for anaerobic organisms by use of a rapid direct colony inoculum.
    Mangels JI; Lindberg LH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 21(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3972999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Olsson-Liljequist B; Nord CE
    Clin Infect Dis; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 4():S293-6. PubMed ID: 8086578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.