These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7389327)

  • 1. Comparative study of the density of particles in suspensions for patch testing.
    Vanneste D; Martin P; Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 7389327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patch test allergens in petrolatum: a reappraisal.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 6499424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular profiling of contact dermatitis skin identifies allergen-dependent differences in immune response.
    Dhingra N; Shemer A; Correa da Rosa J; Rozenblit M; Fuentes-Duculan J; Gittler JK; Finney R; Czarnowicki T; Zheng X; Xu H; Estrada YD; Cardinale I; Suárez-Fariñas M; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 24768652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Petrolatum - a reliable vehicle for metal allergens?
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 7398266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patch test study of 90 patients with tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen(s) are generated in the skin through haptenization.
    Serup J; Hutton Carlsen K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Nov; 71(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 25040844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A contemporary Fischer-Maibach investigation: variations in patch test delivery systems and implications for standardization.
    Hamann D; Hamann CR; Hamann C
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 24201463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man.
    Lachapelle JM; Antoine JL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):850-4. PubMed ID: 2689479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing.
    Väänänen A; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of patch test materials for gold allergy.
    Fowler JF
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Jul; 17(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3115675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data.
    Atkinson JC; Rodi SB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination.
    McLelland J; Shuster S
    Br J Dermatol; 1990 May; 122(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 2354115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studies on purity and stability of photopatch test substances.
    Bruze M; Fregert S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Jan; 9(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6839737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (PPD) by patch testing with PPD 0.3% in petrolatum.
    Geier J; Ballmer-Weber BK; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Bircher A; Weisshaar E; Hillen U
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jul; 69(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23782355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin sensitization: understanding the in vivo situation for the development of reliable in vitro test approaches.
    Aeby P; Python F; Goebel C
    ALTEX; 2007; 24 Spec No():3-5. PubMed ID: 19835043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concentration variability of potent allergens of p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in patch test preparations and commercially available PTBP-FR.
    Hamann CR; Zimerson E; Hamann D; Laugesen L; Carlsson B; Nathansen C; Hamann C; Bruze M
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Apr; 166(4):761-70. PubMed ID: 22182485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardizing the Delivery of 20 μL of Hapten During Patch Testing.
    Selvick A; Stauss K; Strobush K; Taylor L; Picard A; Doll A; Reeder M
    Dermatitis; 2016; 27(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 27649349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch testing with primin in white petrolatum.
    Schubert HJ; Prater E; Sell M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):286. PubMed ID: 4085239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.