These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7389334)

  • 1. Contradictory results following patch testing with Finn Chambers.
    Hammershøy O
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 7389334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propylene glycol in standard patch tests.
    Romaguera C; Garcia Perez A; Moran M; Miranda A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Nov; 7(6):346. PubMed ID: 7338042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact allergy to propylene glycol. Do we use the appropriate test concentration?
    Frosch PJ; Pekar U; Enzmann H
    Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 2302849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in construction workers.
    Fernández Vozmediano JM; Gil Tocados G; Manrique Plaza A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Apr; 28(4):244-5. PubMed ID: 8508637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients.
    Lindelöf B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 4-day patch test reactions to neomycin and formaldehyde.
    Massone L; Anonìde A; Borghi S; Isola V
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Nov; 21(5):344-5. PubMed ID: 2620516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):846-9. PubMed ID: 2689478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proallergens of formaldehyde applied in patch testing of formaldehyde contact allergy.
    Hansen J; Albrechtsen S; Hedegård K
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):838-40. PubMed ID: 2600209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
    Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The repeated open application test (ROAT).
    Hannuksela M; Salo H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 2941220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Galenic quality of test substances].
    Puschmann M
    Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(24):1710-6. PubMed ID: 2964137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
    Szliska C; Rakoski J
    Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misleading patch test results with aluminum Finn chambers and mercury salts.
    Kalveram KJ; Rapp-Frick C; Sorck G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Dec; 6(7):507-8. PubMed ID: 7214903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concentrations of patch test allergens: are we comparing the same things?
    Benezra C; Andanson J; Chabeau C; Ducombs G; Foussereau J; Lachapelle JM; Lacroix M; Martin P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Apr; 4(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 668333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.