180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7389344)
1. Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate?
Dooms-Goossens A; Naert C; Chrispeels MT; Degreef H
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):232. PubMed ID: 7389344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of temperature on the concentration homogeneity of patch test materials.
Goh CL; Kwok SF
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Oct; 15(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 3802807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing.
Väänänen A; Hannuksela M
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The American Academy of Dermatology patch test series for contact dermatitis.
Kanof NB
Int J Dermatol; 1977 Dec; 16(10):827-9. PubMed ID: 598954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new method for intraoral patch testing.
Axéll T; Spiechowicz E; Glantz PO; Andersson G; Larsson A
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Aug; 15(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 3780206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing for contact dermatitis.
Treadgold A
Nursing (Lond); 1983 Jan; 2(9):255-8. PubMed ID: 6554529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch testing with nickel sulphate under occlusion for five hours.
Bruze M
Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 2459886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Patch testing with nickel compounds].
Hums R; Müller S
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1988; 174(12):730-5. PubMed ID: 3215375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch testing.
McGillis ST; Burrall BA; Huntley AC
Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 2691044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic contact dermatitis. Common allergens.
Glass LF; Huntley AC
Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):381-98. PubMed ID: 2691042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antigen preparation for the patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach HI
Occup Med; 1986; 1(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 3303375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Problems attending patch testing for nickel sensitivity.
Fisher AA
Cutis; 1982 Feb; 29(2):148-52, 157, 186. PubMed ID: 7060404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch testing with colophony.
Fregert S; Gruvberger B
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 6499414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test.
Svejgaard E; Morling N; Svejgaard A; Veien NK
Acta Derm Venereol; 1978; 58(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 78640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with nickel sulfate in DMSO.
van Ketel WG
Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Jun; 4(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 668350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Some thoughts on the technique of epicutaneous tests (author's transl)].
Novák M
Cesk Dermatol; 1981 Aug; 56(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 7273160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Metallic nickel on skin and in artificial sweat. Case studies].
Hums R; Carlus V; Müller S
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1988; 174(12):723-9. PubMed ID: 2975233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contact dermatitis and diagnostic techniques.
Rietschel RL
Allergy Proc; 1989; 10(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2534095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
