BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 738986)

  • 1. Stimulus factors which influence the perceived externalization of sound presented through headphones.
    Levy ET; Butler RA
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jan; 18(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 738986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Directional hearing under progressive impoverishment of binaural cues.
    Belendiuk K; Butler RA
    Sens Processes; 1978 Mar; 2(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 705356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of interaural-level-difference fluctuations on the externalization of sound.
    Catic J; Santurette S; Buchholz JM; Gran F; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1232-41. PubMed ID: 23927121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur.
    Perrott DR; Strybel TZ; Manligas CL
    J Aud Res; 1987 Jan; 27(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 3448070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue.
    Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3120-31. PubMed ID: 19045797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaural timing cues do not contribute to the map of space in the ferret superior colliculus: a virtual acoustic space study.
    Campbell RA; Doubell TP; Nodal FR; Schnupp JW; King AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):242-54. PubMed ID: 16162823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Seeber BU; Fastl H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1030-42. PubMed ID: 18247905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sound lateralization regarding amplitude and time factors in various forms of hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1989; (2):24-8. PubMed ID: 2728174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing.
    Francart T; Van den Bogaert T; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3209-13. PubMed ID: 20000934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.
    Tardif E; Murray MM; Meylan R; Spierer L; Clarke S
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 16684510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue: 500-Hz sine tones.
    Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2536-42. PubMed ID: 19894833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of distances of recorded sounds presented through headphones.
    Lounsbury BF; Butler RA
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 515697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.