These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 738988)

  • 1. Distinctive features for short-term memory of consonants in noise.
    Danhauer JL; Rastatter MP; Herman G
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jan; 18(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 738988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.
    Wong PC; Uppunda AK; Parrish TB; Dhar S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):1026-41. PubMed ID: 18658069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
    Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Narne VK; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 19125036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition with the advanced combination encoder and transient emphasis spectral maxima strategies in nucleus 24 recipients.
    Holden LK; Vandali AE; Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):681-701. PubMed ID: 16197281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of speech-shaped noise on the recognition of malayalam and english consonants by malayalam listeners.
    Kalaiah MK; Bhat JS; Shastri U
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(99):55-61. PubMed ID: 32174639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
    Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
    Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Algorithmic modeling of the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) by the hearing sensation fluctuation strength.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Weissgerber T; Kerber S; Fastl H; Hellbrück J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 22038665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.