These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 739098)

  • 1. Growth function for human response to large-amplitude impulse noise.
    Schomer PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Dec; 64(6):1627-32. PubMed ID: 739098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective loudness and annoyance of filtered N-wave sonic booms.
    Niedzwiecki A; Ribner HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):705-7. PubMed ID: 447906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of community response to impulsive noise.
    Schomer PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):520-35. PubMed ID: 3973226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Penalty for impulse noise, derived from annoyance ratings for impulse and road-traffic sounds.
    Vos J; Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 3973214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jan; 75(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 6699282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective loudness of "minimized" sonic boom waveforms.
    Niedzwiecki A; Ribner HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Dec; 64(6):1622-6. PubMed ID: 739097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective loudness of simulated quarry blast waves, with implications for the transition from impulsive to continuous sound.
    Niedzwiecki A; Ribner HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 May; 65(5):1212-7. PubMed ID: 458043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative rates of growth of annoyance of impulsive and non-impulsive noises.
    Fidell S; Silvati L; Pearsons K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):576-85. PubMed ID: 11837963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms.
    Leatherwood JD; Sullivan BM; Shepherd KP; McCurdy DA; Brown SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):586-98. PubMed ID: 11837964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating multidimensional characteristics of noise signals with tones from building mechanical systems and their effects on annoyance.
    Lee J; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):108. PubMed ID: 32006968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indoor human response to blast sounds that generate rattles.
    Schomer PD; Averbuch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):665-73. PubMed ID: 2768676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impulse noise: critical review.
    Henderson D; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):569-84. PubMed ID: 3745686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 1880289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets.
    Di G; Lu K; Shi X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29518036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.