These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7391358)

  • 1. Acoustics in human communication: evolving ideas about the nature of speech.
    Cooper FS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jul; 68(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 7391358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Perception of voiceless plosive consonants in syllables of the "vowel--consonant" type].
    Okhareva NG; Granstrem MP; Chikhman VN; Borozdin AN
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1980 Jan; 66(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 7364105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. II. Modeling and evaluation.
    Smits R; ten Bosch L; Collier R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3865-81. PubMed ID: 8969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users.
    Vandali AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2049-61. PubMed ID: 11386557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility.
    Bradley JS; Reich RD; Norcross SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1820-8. PubMed ID: 10530010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication.
    Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Durlach NI; Braida LD; Conway-Fithian S; Schultz MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 3973218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critique: articulatory-acoustic relations and their role in speech perception.
    Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1693-4. PubMed ID: 8964929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modern methods of investigation in speech production.
    Fujimura O
    Phonetica; 1980; 37(1-2):38-54. PubMed ID: 7413768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can a computer-generated voice be sincere? A case study combining music and synthetic speech.
    Barker P; Newell C; Newell G
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):126-34. PubMed ID: 23705636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops.
    Esposito A; Di Benedetto MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2051-62. PubMed ID: 10530028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of visualizing tone of voice.
    Pullin G; Cook A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 23855927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cerebellar contributions to the perception of temporal cues within the speech and nonspeech domain.
    Ackermann H; Gräber S; Hertrich I; Daum I
    Brain Lang; 1999 May; 67(3):228-41. PubMed ID: 10210632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring expressivity and emotion with artificial voice and speech technologies.
    Pauletto S; Balentine B; Pidcock C; Jones K; Bottaci L; Aretoulaki M; Wells J; Mundy DP; Balentine J
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 24024543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2063-73. PubMed ID: 10530029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term release cues to stop-consonant place of articulation in child speech.
    Chapin C; Tseng C; Lieberman P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jan; 71(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 7054247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: a reanalysis and some implications.
    Miller JL; Grosjean F; Lomanto C
    Phonetica; 1984; 41(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 6535162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment.
    Smits R; ten Bosch L; Collier R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3852-64. PubMed ID: 8969486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Characteristics of the auditory spectral diffraction essential for distinguishing soft vowels from fricative consonants in perception].
    Zhukov SIa
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 3692050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?
    Dietrich S; Ackermann H; Szameitat DP; Alter K
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():295-302. PubMed ID: 17015087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.