These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7391750)

  • 21. Retrospective coding in pigeons' delayed matching-to-sample.
    Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Jan; 12(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 3701260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reinforcer magnitude and resistance to disruption of forgetting functions and response rates.
    Berry MS; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 24723340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.
    Laude JR; Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24043581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of a single-code/default strategy by pigeons to acquire duration sample discriminations.
    Singer RA; Klein ED; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 17330523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Asymmetry in the discrimination of quantity: The role of stimulus generalization.
    Inman RA; Honey RC; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):309-21. PubMed ID: 26121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Medial versus lateral hyperstriatal lesions in pigeons: effects on autoshaping, non-matching-to-sample and spatial discrimination learning at short and long intertrial intervals.
    Macphail EM; Reilly S
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Oct; 35(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 2803545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A three-stimulus midsession reversal task in pigeons with visual and spatial discriminative stimuli.
    McMillan N; Roberts WA
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Jan; 18(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 25227939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.
    Kangas BD; Berry MS; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Mar; 95(2):221-36. PubMed ID: 21541127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Short intertrial interval as a phrasing cue in the reinforcement-pattern learning in rats].
    Yazawa H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Apr; 64(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8355433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.
    Brown GS; White KG
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):309-23. PubMed ID: 16396078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.
    Urcuioli PJ; DeMarse TB; Lionello KM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):279-97. PubMed ID: 10605100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A study of relation between phrasing and intertrial interval in reinforcement pattern learning in rats].
    Yazawa H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1991 Apr; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 1890783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Olfactory conditioning of the sting extension reflex in honeybees: Memory dependence on trial number, interstimulus interval, intertrial interval, and protein synthesis.
    Giurfa M; Fabre E; Flaven-Pouchon J; Groll H; Oberwallner B; Vergoz V; Roussel E; Sandoz JC
    Learn Mem; 2009 Dec; 16(12):761-5. PubMed ID: 19933880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.
    Zentall TR; Roper KL; Sherburne LM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7714447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons.
    Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 23144506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of hippocampal and area parahippocampalis lesions in pigeons: I. Delayed matching to sample.
    Colombo M; Swain N; Harper D; Alsop B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 9225621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Memory mechanisms in pigeons: evidence of base-rate neglect.
    Zentall TR; Clement TS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jan; 28(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11868229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
    Lattal KA; Doepke KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic cue use in pigeon mid-session reversal.
    Rayburn-Reeves RM; Qadri MA; Brooks DI; Keller AM; Cook RG
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():53-63. PubMed ID: 27615541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.