These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7393155)

  • 1. Specifying and evaluating the performance of computed tomography (CT) scanners.
    McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 7393155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating performance characteristics in computerized tomography.
    White DR; Speller RD; Taylor PM
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):221-31. PubMed ID: 7470784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors related to low contrast resolution in CT scanners.
    Goodenough DJ; Weaver KE
    Comput Radiol; 1984; 8(5):297-308. PubMed ID: 6509955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation. Multislice computed tomography systems.
    Health Devices; 2002 May; 31(5):161-88. PubMed ID: 12449920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A slice geometry phantom for cross sectional tomographic imagers.
    Coffey CW; Taylor R; Umstead G
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 2785637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems with contrast-detail curves for CT performance evaluation.
    Hasegawa BH; Cacak RK; Mulvaney JA; Hendee WR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 6976688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.
    McCollough CH; Zink FE
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2223-30. PubMed ID: 10587202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient dosage in computed tomography.
    McCullough EC; Payne JT
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 704862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging.
    Mori S; Endo M; Tsunoo T; Kandatsu S; Tanada S; Aradate H; Saito Y; Miyazaki H; Satoh K; Matsushita S; Kusakabe M
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1348-56. PubMed ID: 15259638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A survey of 29 EMI CT machines in Britain.
    Speller RD; White DR; Veerappan R; Coleman AJ; Waller PE
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):232-40. PubMed ID: 7470785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the performance of 8 computerized tomographs in clinical use in Italy].
    Pinto I; de Denaro M; Giribona P; Giuricin C; Bravar D
    Radiol Med; 1988 Sep; 76(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 3175074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol.
    Colli V; Mangini M; Strocchi S; Lumia D; Canì A; Boffano C; Cesarani F; Rizzi E; Ferrara RM; Andreis IA; Bruno J; Gozzi G; Cacciatori M; Ostinelli A; Vite C; Conte L; Fugazzola C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 21150451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quality-assurance program for mobile CT scanners.
    Padikal TN
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Feb; 16(2):18-20, 25, 61. PubMed ID: 10280639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
    Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technique for evaluating radiation beam and image slice parameters of CT scanners.
    Sorenson JA
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(1):68-9. PubMed ID: 440237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of multivariate regression analysis in contrast-detail studies of CT scanners.
    Trajtenberg M
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 6482841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Multi-slice CT scanners].
    Yu XE; Kang LL; Yang JJ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 25(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 12583224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new phantom for evaluation of low-contrast detectability of X-ray CT scanner.
    Endo M; Iinuma TA; Takenaka E; Inoue M
    Radiat Med; 1984; 2(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 6543966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
    Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of x-ray filtration on dose and image performance of CT scanners.
    Szulc M; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 545116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.