These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7395724)

  • 1. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two different insert types of ear protection in preventing TTS in an industrial environment.
    Royster LH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 7395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
    Royster LH; Lilley DT; Thomas WG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Jan; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 7355721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
    Thunder TD; Lankford JE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB.
    Royster LH; Royster JD; Cecich TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 6480999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Rokas D
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 3385873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Industrial noise: evaluation of its danger and individual protection].
    Wisner A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 5120980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
    Lempert BL; Edwards RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of wearing time on hearing protector attenuation.
    Abel SM; Rokas D
    J Otolaryngol; 1986 Oct; 15(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 3773044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hearing damage as a consequence of firefighters' professional exposure to noise].
    Lalić H; Ferhatović M; Dinko J; Culinović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2009 May; 63(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19580230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective evaluation of a prototype earmuff exhibiting flat and nonlinear attenuation characteristics.
    Stokes JP; Royster LH; Pearson RG; Royster JD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Feb; 52(2):52-60. PubMed ID: 2011979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of enforcement in an industrial hearing conservation program.
    Hager WL; Hoyle ER; Hermann ER
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 7113926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
    Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Auditory threshold and the degree of its temporary and permanent shifts in the textile industry workers].
    Mikołajczyk H; Cieślewicz A
    Med Pr; 1982; 33(1-3):57-64. PubMed ID: 7144543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.