These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7395934)

  • 21. Fetal heart rate patterns preceding death in utero.
    Cetrulo CL; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Nov; 48(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 988521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prolonged pregnancy. I. Observations concerning the causes of fetal distress.
    Leveno KJ; Quirk JG; Cunningham FG; Nelson SD; Santos-Ramos R; Toofanian A; DePalma RT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 150(5 Pt 1):465-73. PubMed ID: 6388333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Prognostic significance of single decelerations occurring in the antenatal CTG].
    Issel EP
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(17):1053-8. PubMed ID: 3788334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor.
    Kjos SL; Leung A; Henry OA; Victor MR; Paul RH; Medearis AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1532-9. PubMed ID: 7503197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Significance of sporadic deceleration during antepartum testing in term pregnancies.
    Jaschevatzky OE; Marom D; Ostrovsky P; Ellenbogen A; Anderman S; Ballas S
    Am J Perinatol; 1998 May; 15(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 9643633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Kellner L; Plancher S; Maulik D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1132-8. PubMed ID: 7943086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Antepartum non-stress cardiotocography in 'high risk' pregnancies.
    McCune GS; Doig J; Ridley W
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Aug; 90(8):697-704. PubMed ID: 6882702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring and umbilical artery waveforms in the recognition of fetal compromise.
    Trudinger BJ; Cook CM; Jones L; Giles WB
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 93(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 3511957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. IV. Observations on elective and nonelective fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Segreti A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 138(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 7424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrapartum ultrasound diagnosis of nuchal cord as a decisive factor in management.
    Feinstein SJ; Lodeiro JG; Vintzileos AM; Weinbaum PJ; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 153(3):308-9. PubMed ID: 3901766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical implications of prospective antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(8):983-90. PubMed ID: 7405996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Daily antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Weiss DB; Pugh C; Simmons SC
    Int Surg; 1977 Sep; 62(9):470-5. PubMed ID: 908631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of antenatal testing: estriol levels versus nonstress testing.
    Lauersen NH; Kurkulos M; Graves ZR; Lewin K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6856212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antepartum nonstress fetal heart rate monitoring: systematic analysis of baseline patterns and decelerations as an adjunct to reactivity in the prediction of fetal risks.
    Brioschi PA; Extermann P; Terracina D; Weil C; Mao WT; Beguin F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 4061531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The nonstress test: how long is enough?
    Brown R; Patrick J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 141(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 7315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.
    Boehm FH; Salyer S; Shah DM; Vaughn WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):566-8. PubMed ID: 3960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.