These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 739820)
41. In defense of the health professions legislation review. Bohnen LS Health Law Can; 1989; 10(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 10313391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician. Curtis T Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Putting the new model of the statute for specialized medical training into practice: implications for European law]. Wahl U; Hespeler U Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Apr; 49(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16523322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Health Professions Legislation Review: the need for greater clarity in the scope of practice scheme. Lester J Health Law Can; 1989; 10(1):127-43, 155. PubMed ID: 10313308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Public opinion: effects on medical education and research. Eckstein JW J Lab Clin Med; 1975 Jan; 85(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 1141732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Looking ahead, Part II. Olsen GG Rehab Manag; 1998; 11(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 10177227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Revalidation of physicians in Canada: are we passing the test? Levinson W CMAJ; 2008 Nov; 179(10):979-80. PubMed ID: 18981429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Problems of the National Practitioner Data Bank. Anderson BJ Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10104765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Doctors in the executive suite: should the U.S. and U.K. be putting M.D. licensure at risk for shortfalls in institutional quality of care? Miller FH J Health Law; 1998; 31(3):217-39. PubMed ID: 10620830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Disciplining doctors in Texas: the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Greenhill J; Starr DS Tex Med; 1990 Sep; 86(9):29-30. PubMed ID: 2218950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The National Practitioner Data Bank: new informational duties for hospitals. Collier HG; Crowley MA Healthspan; 1990 Jan; 7(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 10103540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Penalty actions against aberrant providers, physicians and suppliers of health services and the sharing of information with the insurance industry. Kusserow RP Med Sect Proc; 1987; ():139-50. PubMed ID: 3452823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Disciplinary measures for healthcare practitioners in the Netherlands 1983-2002]. Hout FA; Cuperus-Bosmat JM; de Peuter OR; Hubben JH; van der Wal G Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Apr; 151(15):881-6. PubMed ID: 17472121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The social control of medical practice. Licensure versus output monitoring. Tancredi LR; Woods J Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1972 Jan; 50(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 5060144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Managed care regulation in the States: the impact on physicians' practices and clinical autonomy. Kronebusch K; Schlesinger M; Thomas T J Health Polit Policy Law; 2009 Apr; 34(2):219-59. PubMed ID: 19276317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]