These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7398264)

  • 1. Nonanoic acid irritation - a positive control at routine patch testing?
    Wahlberg JE; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 7398264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin irritancy from nonanoic acid.
    Wahlberg JE; Wrangsjö K; Hietasalo A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 4085226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of irritant reactions induced by nonanoic acid and hydrochloric acid.
    Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 7821005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects.
    Reiche L; Willis C; Wilkinson J; Shaw S; de Lacharrière O
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 9840260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonanoic acid--an experimental irritant.
    Wahlberg JE; Lindberg M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 14678207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The irritant potential of n-propanol (nonanoic acid vehicle) in cumulative skin irritation: a validation study of two different human in vivo test models.
    Clemmensen A; Andersen F; Petersen TK; Kalden H; Melgaard A; Andersen KE
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 19159372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
    Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative irritancy of free fatty acids of different chain length.
    Stillman MA; Maibach HI; Shalita AR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 233889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The calcipotriol dose-irritation relationship: 48 hour occlusive testing in healthy volunteers using Finn Chambers.
    Fullerton A; Benfeldt E; Petersen JR; Jensen SB; Serup J
    Br J Dermatol; 1998 Feb; 138(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 9602871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An arm immersion model of compromised skin (I). Influence on irritation reactions.
    Allenby CF; Basketter DA; Dickens A; Barnes EG; Brough HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 8458223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories.
    Kuzmina N; Duval C; Johnsson S; Boman A; Lindberg M; Emtestam L
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14641117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
    Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal evaluation time point for patch testing to predict skin irritation of commercial topical drugs.
    Horita K; Tomita C; Yasoshima M; Matsunaga K
    J Dermatol; 2015 Sep; 42(9):851-60. PubMed ID: 25982127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A two-center study of the development of acute irritation responses to fatty acids.
    Robinson MK; Whittle E; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Sep; 10(3):136-45. PubMed ID: 10444106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of patch test size and design on the distribution of erythema induced by sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Nicholson M; Willis CM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 10554060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test.
    Basketter DA; Griffiths HA; Wang XM; Wilhelm KP; McFadden J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Oct; 35(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 8957639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact dermatitis with systemic reactions caused by cetearyl isononanoate.
    Ito K; Fujimura N; Uchida T; Ikezawa Z; Aihara M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Nov; 69(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 24117743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa.
    Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 121(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2611122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.