These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7400191)

  • 1. Methodological assessments of subcutaneous implantation techniques.
    Marion L; Haugen E; Mjör IA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jul; 14(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 7400191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to implantation of surgical cement Y-O with eugenol combined with antibacterial substances].
    Milanezi LA; Garcia VG; Holland R; Tagliavini RL
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1980; 34(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 6933649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term observation of subcutaneous tissue reaction to synthetic auditory ossicle (Bioceram) in rats.
    Zhu CS; Ohsaki K; Ii K; Ye Q; Tran YH; Ohba Y; Moriyama K
    J Med Invest; 1999 Feb; 46(1-2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10408164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative characterization of cells at the interface of long-term implants of selected polymers.
    Behling CA; Spector M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(5):653-66. PubMed ID: 3711138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A method of quantitative determination of tissue tolerance in decreased relative movement between implant and tissue].
    Geret V; Rahn BA; Mathys R; Straumann F; Perren SM
    Helv Chir Acta; 1979 May; 46(1-2):189-93. PubMed ID: 468567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative in vivo studies of hyperemia in the course of the tissue response to biomaterial implantation.
    Bouet T; Schmitt M; Desuzinges C; Eloy R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Nov; 24(11):1439-61. PubMed ID: 2279980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fibrous capsule formation in response to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene treated with peptides that influence adhesion.
    Johnson R; Harrison D; Tucci M; Tsao A; Lemos M; Puckett A; Hughes JL; Benghuzzi H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():47-52. PubMed ID: 9603011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcutaneous implants: reactions of the skin-implant interface.
    Winter GD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(3):99-113. PubMed ID: 4616966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue-implant response following soft tissue implantation of poly-L-lysine coated UHMW-polyethylene into adult male rats.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Tucci S
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():19-24. PubMed ID: 11347386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subcutaneous implants for assessments of dental materials with emphasis on periodontal dressings.
    Haugen E; Mjör IA
    J Periodontal Res; 1978 May; 13(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 149196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reaction of rat connective tissue to the implant of some components of periodontal dressings. Histological study].
    Tagliavini RL; Holland R; Milanezi LA
    Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1974; 3(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 4535896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the general features of the soft tissue response to some metals and ceramics using quantitative histomorphometry.
    Therin M; Christel P; Meunier A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Nov; 28(11):1267-76. PubMed ID: 7829556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A histomorphometric comparison of the muscular tissue reactions to high-density polyethylene in rats and rabbits.
    Christel P; Meunier A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Oct; 23(10):1169-82. PubMed ID: 2808462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vivo study of the host response to starch-based polymers and composites subcutaneously implanted in rats.
    Marques AP; Reis RL; Hunt JA
    Macromol Biosci; 2005 Aug; 5(8):775-85. PubMed ID: 16080170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue engineered cartilage "bioshell" protective layer for subcutaneous implants.
    Monroy A; Kojima K; Ghanem MA; Paz AC; Kamil S; Vacanti CA; Eavey RD
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 71(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 17240459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro and in vivo (cyto)toxicity assays using PVC and LDPE as model materials.
    Van Tienhoven EA; Korbee D; Schipper L; Verharen HW; De Jong WH
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jul; 78(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 16628708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of implantation tests for control materials].
    Marion L
    Zobozdrav Vestn; 1985; 40(1-5):114-20. PubMed ID: 3862289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative analysis of tissue reaction to acrylic resin materials in studies on Wistar strain rats].
    Sobolewska E
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1999; 45():253-64. PubMed ID: 10909494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.