These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7404425)

  • 1. What's new in radiology: the mammography issue.
    Lester RG
    Tex Med; 1980 Jun; 76(6):43-4. PubMed ID: 7404425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography: a radiologist's view.
    Strax P
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1979; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 110399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mammography in mass-screening].
    Van Bekkum DW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Dec; 121(50):2009-12. PubMed ID: 927579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Carcinogenic risk of mammography].
    Osipova VN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1979 May; 24(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 374924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indications and risk-benefit of mammography.
    Gold RH
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jun; 8(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 448297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography: a statement of the American Cancer Society. National Task Force on Breast Cancer Control.
    Conn Med; 1983 Jan; 47(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 6825428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study of radiation received in mammography].
    Rodríguez Cuevas S; Rodríguez Islas C
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1980 Mar; 47(281):155-61. PubMed ID: 7390211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality, dosage and hazard rates in mammography].
    Penn W
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():101-3. PubMed ID: 601808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Possibilities of decreasing the risk associated with the irradiation in mammography].
    Zal'tsman IN; Novikova LV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1981; (4):75-9. PubMed ID: 7292971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-dose mammography. Application to medical practice.
    Feig SA
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2107-9. PubMed ID: 490795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography: benefit or risk?
    Buchanan JB; Weisberg BF
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1978 Jun; 67(6):409-10. PubMed ID: 659998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography and cancer of the breast.
    McFarlane D
    Can Med Assoc J; 1972 Apr; 106(7):805-8. PubMed ID: 4335900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammography controversy].
    Strasser E
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1978 Aug; 128(15):480-1. PubMed ID: 706403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risks of mammograms.
    Swartz HM; Reichling BA
    JAMA; 1977 Mar; 237(10):965-6. PubMed ID: 576249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography in medical practice. A rational approach.
    Moskowitz M
    JAMA; 1978 Oct; 240(17):1898-9. PubMed ID: 691205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation risk in mammography as presented by the media].
    Jung H
    Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):335. PubMed ID: 9819643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancer of the breast--induction by radiation and role of mammography.
    Simon N
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Oct; 2(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 145649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic screening: a reappraisal of benefits and risks.
    Bailar JC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 630747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation hazard in mammography.
    Strax P
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1977; 12():247-50. PubMed ID: 918104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography in breast examination.
    Peck DR
    Arch Intern Med; 1980 Mar; 140(3):441. PubMed ID: 7362369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.