These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 740461)

  • 1. Possible role of transient and sustained visual mechanisms in the determination of similarity judgments.
    Petersik JT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 1):683-98. PubMed ID: 740461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceptual dimensions of natural dynamic flow.
    Morgenstern Y; Kersten DJ
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):7. PubMed ID: 29049594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal representation of visual texture as the basis for the judgment of similarity.
    Harvey LO; Gervais MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):741-53. PubMed ID: 6457089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Pike R; Jackson K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metrics of the perception of body movement.
    Giese MA; Thornton I; Edelman S
    J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):13.1-18. PubMed ID: 18831649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast requirements for picture recognition: converging evidence for a spatial frequency hypothesis.
    Petersik JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Jul; 114(3):229-47. PubMed ID: 3612107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Object perception is selectively slowed by a visually similar working memory load.
    Robinson A; Manzi A; Triesch J
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):7.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency judgements: the problem of defining a perceptual event.
    Johnson MK; Peterson MA; Yap EC; Rose PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 2522137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual judgments of kinship: an alternative perspective.
    Lorusso L; Brelstaff G; Brodo L; Lagorio A; Grosso E
    Perception; 2011; 40(11):1282-9. PubMed ID: 22416587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual ambiguity of bistable visual stimuli causes no or little increase in perceptual latency.
    Takei S; Nishida S
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):23.1-15. PubMed ID: 20465341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optional processes in similarity judgments.
    Melara RD; Marks LE; Lesko KE
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 1549431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Perceptual judgments of novel contour shapes and hierarchical descriptions of geometrical properties].
    Endo N; Saiki J; Nakao Y; Saito H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Oct; 74(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 14708480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.
    Ashby FG; Lee WW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):150-72. PubMed ID: 1830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements.
    Hebart MN; Zheng CY; Pereira F; Baker CI
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Nov; 4(11):1173-1185. PubMed ID: 33046861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
    Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward the development of a feature-space representation for a complex natural category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; Meagher BJ; Douglas BJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):530-556. PubMed ID: 28389853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On functional concepts for the explanation of visual pattern recognition.
    Glünder H
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3516942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit and explicit features of paintings.
    Marković S; Radonjić A
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):229-59. PubMed ID: 18534101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.