These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7405966)

  • 1. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Kurse J
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring as a predictor of fetal distress and immediate neonatal condition in low-birth weight (less than or equal to 1,800 grams) infants.
    Douvas SG; Meeks GR; Graves G; Walsh DA; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 148(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 6695976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing neonatal outcomes in the very-low-birth-weight fetus (< 1500 grams) with a breech presentation.
    Cibils LA; Karrison T; Brown L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 8030730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Appropriate delivery mode and timing of termination for pregnancy with low birth weight infants].
    Chen Y; Zou L; Li G; Ruan Y; Wang X; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 50(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 26311449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.
    Zalar RW; Quilligan EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 135(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 38669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome?
    Johnstone FD; Campbell DM; Hughes GJ
    Lancet; 1978 Jun; 1(8077):1298-300. PubMed ID: 78060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests.
    Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7457525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perinatal events and intraventricular/subependymal hemorrhage in the very low-birth weight infant.
    Strauss A; Kirz D; Modanlou HD; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 151(8):1022-7. PubMed ID: 3985063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. VIII. Breech presentations.
    White PC; Cibils LA
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Jan; 29(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 6708021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal outcome in monitored and unmonitored high-risk deliveries.
    Weinraub Z; Caspi E; Brook I; Rahmani P; Bukovsky I; Schreyer P
    Isr J Med Sci; 1978 Feb; 14(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 649354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.