These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7409356)

  • 1. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.
    Ritter R; Johnson RM; Northern JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
    Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest stability and effects of psychophysical methods on the speech loudness discomfort level.
    Beattie RC; Sheffler MV
    Audiology; 1981; 20(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 7224979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
    Edgerton BJ; Beattie RC; Wides JW
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7409357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.
    Dirks DD; Kamm CA; Dubno JR; Velde TM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 7323674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Cord MT
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of attack time and release time on speech intelligibility. A study of the effects of AGC on normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects.
    Jerlvall LB; Lindblad AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):341-53. PubMed ID: 292147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.