These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds. Ritter R; Johnson RM; Northern JL J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Ewert SD; Oetting D Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects. Beattie RC; Boyd RL J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution. Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners. Byrne D J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Some effects of spectral shaping on recognition of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. Kamm CA; Dirks DD; Carterette EC J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1211-24. PubMed ID: 7085993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. Sammeth CA; Birman M; Hecox KE Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level. Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ; Gager DW J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Nov; 44(4):435-58. PubMed ID: 513668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contour test of loudness perception. Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort. Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired. Beattie RC; Warren VG Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners. Moore BC; Gibbs A; Onions G; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Festen JM; Plomp R J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]