These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7409538)

  • 1. [The use of intrauterine device inserted during the immediate postabortion time].
    Reynoso Ron L; Alvarado Durán A; Milton Cordero T; Aznar Ramos R
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1980 May; 47(283):311-20. PubMed ID: 7409538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Migration of an intrauterine device after salpingectomy. Translocation of an in situ intrauterine device to the abdominal cavity after tubal pregnancy and salpingectomy].
    Trolle C; Sommer W
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Apr; 107(12):1029, 1036. PubMed ID: 3603456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Intrauterine fragmentation of Lippes device].
    Ruíz Moreno JA; Rubio Lotvin B; Bolio Arista R
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1979 Feb; 45(268):139-44. PubMed ID: 540760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Extraction of an ectopic intrauterine device by laparoscopy].
    Gayán P; Galán G; Corbalán G; Mayorga L; Tisné L; Boban K; David I; Galdames M
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1978; 43(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 162074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion.
    Stanek AM; Bednarek PH; Nichols MD; Jensen JT; Edelman AB
    Contraception; 2009 Mar; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 19185676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of the Ypsilon IUD in Brazil.
    Rodrigues W; Nogueira T
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 1234081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of the use of intrauterine contraceptives during early puerperium (author's transl)].
    Knopiński S; Kubicki J
    Przegl Lek; 1977; 34(4):437-9. PubMed ID: 560712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fluid-filled intrauterine device: initial clinical trials.
    Margolis AJ; Mackay HT
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 9(3-4):11-5. PubMed ID: 1164992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The use of intrauterine devices].
    Ahued Ahued JR; Sangines Martínez A; Okhysen Cerda KC; Pineda Guerrero E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Jul; 50(303):197-200. PubMed ID: 7182235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [6-year analysis of the use of the intrauterine device].
    Hofmann R
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1987; 81(6):281-4. PubMed ID: 3617809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors leading to the removal of the intrauterine implant Gynefix.
    Bonacho I; Gómez-Besteiro MI; Pita S
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Sep; 7(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12428931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [More confidence in the intrauterine device].
    Wolff U
    Ther Ggw; 1977 May; 116(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 867296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Time of application of intrauterine devices in women with prior voluntary abortions].
    Balbi C; D'Ajello M; Balbi GC
    Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1980; 85(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 7337562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.
    Letti Müller AL; Lopes Ramos JG; Martins-Costa SH; Palma Dias RS; Valério EG; Hammes LS; Glitz CL; Zucatto AE; Vettori DV; Magalhães JA
    Contraception; 2005 Sep; 72(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 16102554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of intrauterine devices: ninth progress report of the Cooperative Statistical Program.
    Tietze C
    Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Jul; (55):1-40. PubMed ID: 5538466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].
    Lara Ricalde R; Menocal Tobías G; Ramos Pérez C; Velázquez Ramírez N
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Jun; 74(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 16970116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experience with the Dalkon shield].
    van Os WA; Loendersloot EW; Rhemrev PE; Voslarova M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1975 Nov; 119(47):1835-9. PubMed ID: 1240603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with the Saf - T - Coil.
    Gunaratne M
    Ceylon Med J; 1976 Mar; 21(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 975414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.