These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7409604)

  • 1. [Evaluation of copper intrauterine devices].
    Jaworska-Karwowska J; Lukasik I
    Ginekol Pol; 1980 Jul; 51(7):667-70. PubMed ID: 7409604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical aspects of contraception by means of copper-7 and copper-T intrauterine devices].
    Peksa A; Sternadel Z
    Ginekol Pol; 1978 Sep; 49(9):781-5. PubMed ID: 730064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Four years of a comparative study with Nova T and Copper T 200 IUDS.
    Nielsen NC; Pyörälä T; Allonen H; Nygren KG; Luukkainen T
    Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 7128132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuing IUD research.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1981 Jan; 2(2):4. PubMed ID: 12339100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in diabetics.
    Craig GM
    Br J Sex Med; 1982 Feb; 9():44-8. PubMed ID: 12279278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
    Finger WR; Barr D
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The IUD: experience on 1,000 cases].
    Verrocchi G; Camplone L
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1981; 9(5):433-5. PubMed ID: 12264245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of IUDs in developing countries: a comparative study.
    Farr G; Burdan A
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):6-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12284280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Copper IUDs.
    Thiery M
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jul; 4(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 12265360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The acceptability of current contraceptive methods to adolescents].
    Sotnikova EI; Dubnitskaia LV; Perminova SG
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (3):26-30. PubMed ID: 8048682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experience in using intrauterine contraceptive devices by women with chronic pyelonephritis].
    Kurbanova MKh
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1985 Jul; (7):52-5. PubMed ID: 2932940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study of the acceptability of inert and copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Manuilova IA; Dubnitskaia LV
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1988 Nov; (11):47-50. PubMed ID: 3239684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The first year of clinical experience with concurrent post abortal insertion of copper "T" 200.
    Rajan R; Usha L; Venkitakrishnan S
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1979 Apr; 29(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 12335887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.