BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7412849)

  • 1. Washington report: a conversation with Vincent T. DeVita, Jr., M.D.. Interview by Daniel S. Greenberg.
    DeVita VT
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(17):1014-6. PubMed ID: 7412849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise.
    Wyngaarden JB
    P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Washington Report. Conflicting remedies for the National Institutes of Health.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1979 May; 300(21):1231-2. PubMed ID: 431679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of NHLBI requests for applications.
    Roth CA
    Physiologist; 1987 Jun; 30(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 3602117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research for hire.
    Serafini MW
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Mar; 28(13):704-8. PubMed ID: 10155831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The NIH and numbers: a vital concern's concern.
    Healy B; Keyworth GA
    N Engl J Med; 1985 May; 312(22):1450-2. PubMed ID: 3990746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a federal philosophy about academic medicine.
    Fredrickson DS
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1981; 57(6):454-69. PubMed ID: 6941839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Building a Trojan horse. Science under the Reagan Administration.
    Holtzman E
    Health PAC Bull; 1984; 15(5):23-4. PubMed ID: 10269033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH baffled by drop in applications.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6485):87. PubMed ID: 8022489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stat bite: NCI R01 success rates, 1970-2005.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1437. PubMed ID: 17047188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
    Loscalzo J
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1665-7. PubMed ID: 16625006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stat bite: NIH, NCI appropriations, 1997-2007.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376. PubMed ID: 16537826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic issues in defining stable funding levels for HIV/AIDS research.
    Eastaugh SR
    J Health Adm Educ; 1992; 10(1):139-49. PubMed ID: 10118035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Washington Report. NIH: with friends like that..
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Jun; 302(26):1490-2. PubMed ID: 7374726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH, related agencies face flat budget future.
    Finkelstein JB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):376-7. PubMed ID: 16537827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.