These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7413390)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of the Group Embedded Figures Test across the life span.
    Panek PE; Funk LG; Nelson PK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Jun; 50(3 Pt 2):1171-4. PubMed ID: 7413390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the Group Embedded Figures Test for a grade school sample.
    Lis DJ; Powers JE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Apr; 48(2):660-2. PubMed ID: 461067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construct validity of the Children's Embedded Figures Test.
    Glynn MA; Stoner SB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Jun; 64(3 Pt 2):1035-8. PubMed ID: 3627908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a Group Embedded Figures Test for young children.
    Cromack TR; Stone MK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Oct; 51(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 7443366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of different correction methods for measuring Rod-and-Frame Test performance.
    Tinajero C; Páramo MF; Quiroga MA; Rodríguez-González J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Feb; 90(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 10769886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construct validity of perceptual style: role of stimulus size in the embedded-figures test and the rod-and-frame test.
    Streibel MJ; Ebenholtz SM
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Feb; 31(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 7079092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric data on the Group Embedded Figures Test for a sample of adult learners.
    Cummings AL; Murray HG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Oct; 65(2):583-6. PubMed ID: 3696928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Group Embedded-Figures Test: psychometric data.
    Carter H; Loo R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 7367185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laterality and field dependence.
    Falcone DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 4069928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factor structure of shortened Children's Embedded Figures Test for different age groups.
    Hardy RC; Eliot J; Burlingame K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Oct; 63(2 Pt 1):479-86. PubMed ID: 3774455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management.
    Murphy HJ; Casey B; Day DA; Young JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1135-8. PubMed ID: 9229425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of practice and training in spatial skills on embedded figures scores of males and females.
    Johnson S; Flinn JM; Tyer ZE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):975-84. PubMed ID: 482055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of field dependence in young children.
    Kojima H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):479-92. PubMed ID: 662547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between field-dependence/independence and personality in older adult females.
    Panek PE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3):811-4. PubMed ID: 7099891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlations between Witkin's Group Embedded Figures Test and Nickel's Rod and Frame Test.
    Preston JC; King LL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Apr; 48(2):670. PubMed ID: 461069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item difficulty and item validity for the Children's Group Embedded Figures Test.
    Rusch RR; Trigg CL; Brogan R; Petriquin S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 8177691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations among scores on measures of field dependence-independence cognitive style, cognitive ability, and sustained attention.
    Amador-Campos JA; Kirchner-Nebot T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Feb; 88(1):236-9. PubMed ID: 10214649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do confusing information and egocentric instructions influence perception?
    Brown MS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Aug; 59(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 6493930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test as a measure of field-dependence/independence.
    Saracho ON
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 6522200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speed vs accuracy instructions and field dependence on college students' digit-symbol matching performance.
    Wong JL; Gilpin AR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):314. PubMed ID: 1945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.