These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7414228)

  • 1. [Quality control of Roentgen equipment with automatic exposure using a newly developed test phantom. Part II: surface dose, image parameters and quality number (author's transl)].
    Hagemann G
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Sep; 33(9):475-82. PubMed ID: 7414228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control in X-ray diagnostic equipment with automatic exposure using a newly-developed test phantom. I. Tube voltage and exposure time].
    Hagemann G
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Aug; 33(8):379-85. PubMed ID: 7403789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Practical quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Stender HS
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Dec; 33(12):618-25. PubMed ID: 7455537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dose output at an image intensifier with peak value- or mean value-control].
    Bronder T
    Strahlentherapie; 1985 Jan; 161(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 3969693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality control in x-ray diagnosis by using a universally applicable phantom].
    Eder H
    Rofo; 1983 Nov; 139(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 6416970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality control of mammography: potential use of a new device for testing the image quality and the dose].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Gambaccini M; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 8975313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experiences in the testing of standard data on roentgen diagnostic equipment].
    Klimpel H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):105-8. PubMed ID: 4001772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J; Idris HH; Jansen JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):269-73. PubMed ID: 16461526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A quality assurance program for simulators in radiotherapy. 1: The universal phantom for quality control of therapy simulators and teletherapy equipment].
    Baltas D; Müller-Sievers K; Kober B
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1993 May; 169(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 8503089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Check of compliance with quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in quality control].
    Ropolo R; Isoardi P; Catuzzo P; Bianchi SD; Bradac GB; Cammarota T; Davini O; De Lucchi R; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 11360757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.