These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects. Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures. Vandeveer MR; Norden LC J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive programs for analysis of the visual field by automatic perimetry--basic problems and solutions. Efforts oriented towards the realisation of the generalised spatially adaptive Octopus program SAPRO. Haeberlin H; Fankhauser F Doc Ophthalmol; 1980 Dec; 50(1):123-41. PubMed ID: 7472130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry. Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss. Satgunam P; Apfelbaum HL; Peli E Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1265-75. PubMed ID: 22922780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual field defects in optic neuritis and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: distinctive features. Gerling J; Meyer JH; Kommerell G Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Mar; 236(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 9541821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Friedmann visual field analyser tested on neuro-ophthalmological cases. Bynke H; Nordenfelt L Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1974; 52(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 4480333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer. Hicks BC; Anderson DR Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How effective is perimetry in current practice? Trobe JD Ophthalmology; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1380-3. PubMed ID: 6664679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry. Keltner JL; Johnson CA Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Threshold-oriented suprathreshold perimetry and threshold value perimetry with the Tübigen CC Automated Perimeter. A comparative study]. Wohlrab TM; Kreinberger H; Erb C; Stübiger N; Dorner-schandl F; Thiel HJ Ophthalmologe; 1998 Feb; 95(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 9545786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual Field Defect Patterns Associated With Lesions of the Retrochiasmal Visual Pathway. Cho J; Liao E; Trobe JD J Neuroophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 42(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 36166759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peripheral homonymous hemianopia: correlation between lesion location and visual field defects by means of cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps. Papageorgiou E; Ticini LF; Schiefer U J Neuroophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 21623227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry. Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Shuster JJ; Krischer JP Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 Nov; 90(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 7446646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The limitations of kinetic perimetry in early scotoma detection. Portney GL; Krohn MA Ophthalmology; 1978 Mar; 85(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 662282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects. Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]