These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7414506)

  • 21. Visual field defects.
    Jay WM
    Am Fam Physician; 1981 Aug; 24(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 7258077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative perimetry in compressive optic neuropathy and optic neuritis.
    Trobe JD; Glaser JS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1978 Jul; 96(7):1210-6. PubMed ID: 666629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tangent screen perimetry using twin test objects.
    Coyle JT; Milam DF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jun; 83(6):923-4. PubMed ID: 868998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recent developments in investigations of visual fields.
    Bedwell CH
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Oct; 55(10):681-99. PubMed ID: 747194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects.
    Chong LX; McKendrick AM; Ganeshrao SB; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3265-74. PubMed ID: 24781947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Suprathreshold static perimetry. Initial clinical trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Balestrery FG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1979 Feb; 97(2):260-72. PubMed ID: 399178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perimetry and visual field defects.
    Wall M
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2021; 178():51-77. PubMed ID: 33832687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: a comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation.
    Artes PH; Henson DB; Harper R; McLeod D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 44(6):2582-7. PubMed ID: 12766060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry.
    Meyer DR; Stern JH; Jarvis JM; Lininger LL
    Ophthalmology; 1993 May; 100(5):651-8; discussion 658-9. PubMed ID: 8493006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Threshold Amsler grid testing. Cross-polarizing lenses enhance yield.
    Wall M; Sadun AA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):520-3. PubMed ID: 3954654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pituitary adenoma revealed by paracentral junctional scotoma of traquair.
    Mojon DS; Odel JG; Rios RJ; Hirano M
    Ophthalmologica; 1997; 211(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9097317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Techniques and developments in automated perimetry: a review.
    Wild JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(3):295-308. PubMed ID: 3077648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The repeatability of mean defect with size III and size V standard automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Doyle CK; Zamba KD; Artes P; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1345-51. PubMed ID: 23341012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical comparison of the Friedmann visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry.
    Gutteridge IF
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 7065111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.