These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7415827)

  • 1. Electroretinography by skin electrodes and signal averaging method.
    Mustonen E; Sulg I
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Jun; 58(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 7415827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and results of photopic flash electroretinogram performed with skin electrodes in infants.
    Bui Quoc E; Albuisson E; Ingster-Moati I
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 21748726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison between subtraction skin electrodes and corneal-contact electrodes in flash electroretinograms].
    Kaid T; Matsunag M; Hanaya J; Nakamura Y; Ohtani S; Miyat K; Kondo M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 117(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23424970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time and frequency analysis of simultaneously recorded corneal and non-corneal electroretinogram.
    Gur M; Gath I
    J Biomed Eng; 1979 Jul; 1(3):172-4. PubMed ID: 548646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults.
    Bradshaw K; Hansen R; Fulton A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 109(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15675199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of varying skin surface electrode position on electroretinogram responses recorded using a handheld stimulating and recording system.
    Hobby AE; Kozareva D; Yonova-Doing E; Hossain IT; Katta M; Huntjens B; Hammond CJ; Binns AM; Mahroo OA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 137(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30046929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.
    Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial differences in corneal electroretinogram potentials measured in rat with a contact lens electrode array.
    Krakova Y; Tajalli H; Thongpang S; Derafshi Z; Ban T; Rahmani S; Selner AN; Al-Tarouti A; Williams JC; Hetling JR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 129(3):151-66. PubMed ID: 25266461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flash electroretinography: normative values with surface skin electrodes and no pupil dilation using a standard stimulation protocol.
    Papathanasiou ES; Papacostas SS
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 116(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 17610098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel method to reduce noise in electroretinography using skin electrodes: a study of noise level, inter-session variability, and reproducibility.
    Yamashita T; Miki A; Tabuchi A; Funada H; Kondo M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):317-324. PubMed ID: 27278187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electroretinogram (ERG) and visual evoked response (VER) studies in patients with optic disc drusen.
    Mustonen E; Sulg I; Kallanranta T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Aug; 58(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 7211250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal Potential Maps Measured With Multi-Electrode Electroretinography in Rat Eyes With Experimental Lesions.
    Derafshi Z; Kunzer BE; Mugler EM; Rokhmanova N; Park DW; Tajalli H; Shetty K; Ma Z; Williams JC; Hetling JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jun; 58(7):2863-2873. PubMed ID: 28586910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of a new disposable ERG electrode.
    Hiroi K; Miyake M; Hashimoto T; Honda Y
    Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 8751335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical application of the pattern electroretinogram with lid skin electrode.
    Kakisu Y; Mizota A; Adachi E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1986 Jul; 63(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 3743337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes.
    Wali N; Leguire LE
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1991; 76(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 1935545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode.
    Kriss A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 May; 16(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 8089032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non corneal closed eye electroretinography in healthy persons and in patients with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (Stengel-Batten-Spielmeyer-Vogt disease).
    Ganes T; Kerty E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 7315215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electroretinography in dogs using a fiber electrode prototype.
    Pereira AL; Montiani-Ferreira F; Santos VR; Salomão SR; Souza C; Berezovsky A
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23558860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERGs on the brain: the benefits of simultaneous flash retinal and cortical responses in paediatric cerebral visual impairment.
    Handley SE; Thompson DA; Prise KL; Liasis A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):223-227. PubMed ID: 29725862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.