These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7419801)

  • 1. Aural distortion product fl + fh: growth rate and phase characteristics at different frequencies.
    Erdreich J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):440-5. PubMed ID: 7419801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaural octave phase-shift detection and aural harmonic distortion.
    Ayres TJ; Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):414-8. PubMed ID: 6480993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of envelope frequency.
    Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 74(6):1709-15. PubMed ID: 6655128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical measures of two-tone suppression and distortion products (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1).
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):930-50. PubMed ID: 6841819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different behaviour of quadratic and cubic difference tones.
    Zwicker E
    Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 1(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 541277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intermodulation product pair 2f1 +/- fh: masking and growth.
    Erdreich J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 Nov; 62(5):1252-5. PubMed ID: 915118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A case study of monaural diplacusis.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 4066513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of the 2f1-f2 cubic difference tone with the binaural masking-level difference.
    Lutfi FA; Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 7217519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of signal phase and masker separation on two-tone masking.
    Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 3745679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
    Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behaviors of cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions evoked by amplitude modulated tones.
    Bian L; Chen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):828-39. PubMed ID: 21361441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse frequency dependence of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking patterns at low levels.
    Zwicker E; Jaroszewski A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1508-12. PubMed ID: 7108025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.