These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7419804)

  • 1. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids.
    Punch JL; Montgomery AA; Schwartz DM; Walden BE; Prosek RA; Howard MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 7419804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality.
    Punch JL; Beck EL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Aug; 45(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 7412226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality judgments of hearing aid-processed speech and music by normal and otopathologic listeners.
    Punch JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 659290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preference judgments of artificial processed and hearing-aid transduced speech.
    Versfeld NJ; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Sep; 106(3 Pt 1):1566-78. PubMed ID: 10489712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate strategy for prediction of psychoacoustic performance from electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids.
    Smaldino J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 528289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consonant similarity judgments by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Schwartz DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 7442174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of room reverberation upon hearing aid quality judgments.
    Harris RW; Goldstein DP
    Audiology; 1979; 18(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 464895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pairwise listener preferences in hearing aid evaluation.
    Punch JL; Parker CA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):366-74. PubMed ID: 7300278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Davis LA; Davidson SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 8783128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality ratings for frequency-shaped peak-clipped speech: results for listeners with hearing loss.
    Kozma-Spytek L; Kates JM; Revoile SG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1115-23. PubMed ID: 8959597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aid quality judgments in reverberant and nonreverberant environments using a magnitude estimation procedure.
    Harris RW; Goldstein DP
    Audiology; 1985; 24(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 3977782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of multidimensional stimuli containing speech cues and the effects of training.
    Christensen LA; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2297-310. PubMed ID: 9348688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 738919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.