These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7419804)
1. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids. Punch JL; Montgomery AA; Schwartz DM; Walden BE; Prosek RA; Howard MT J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 7419804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality. Punch JL; Beck EL J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Aug; 45(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 7412226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality judgments of hearing aid-processed speech and music by normal and otopathologic listeners. Punch JL J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 659290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort. Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multivariate strategy for prediction of psychoacoustic performance from electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids. Smaldino J J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 528289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality. Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of room reverberation upon hearing aid quality judgments. Harris RW; Goldstein DP Audiology; 1979; 18(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 464895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pairwise listener preferences in hearing aid evaluation. Punch JL; Parker CA J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):366-74. PubMed ID: 7300278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Davis LA; Davidson SA J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 8783128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments. Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods. Moore BC; Sęk A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]