These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 742349)

  • 21. Serial recording of visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.
    Matthews WB; Small DG
    J Neurol Sci; 1979 Jan; 40(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 762589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnosis of demyelination processes based on the visual evoked potential test using a checkerboard reversal pattern].
    Kowalski JW
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1987; 21(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 3449770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pattern visual evoked potentials and spatial vision in retrobulbar neuritis and multiple sclerosis.
    Neima D; Regan D
    Arch Neurol; 1984 Feb; 41(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 6691824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis.
    McDonald WI; Halliday AM
    Br Med Bull; 1977 Jan; 33(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 318887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation between morphological and functional retinal impairment in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Parisi V; Manni G; Spadaro M; Colacino G; Restuccia R; Marchi S; Bucci MG; Pierelli F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 40(11):2520-7. PubMed ID: 10509645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-contrast visual evoked potential and early detection of optic demyelination.
    Luo JJ; Bumanlag F; Dun N
    J Neurol Sci; 2019 Apr; 399():108-110. PubMed ID: 30798107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of visual evoked potentials elicited by light-emitting diodes and TV monitor stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis and potentially related conditions.
    Andersson T; Sidén A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 92(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 7527764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analysis of VEP components in optic neuritis.
    Andersson T; Sidén A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 35(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 7781577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Progression of visual evoked potential abnormalities in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis.
    Alshuaib WB
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jun; 40(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 10907603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. VISTECH contrast sensitivity and pattern-VEP in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Augustinus B; Van den Bergh L; Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1990; 236():89-96. PubMed ID: 2093410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. VEP and PERG in patients with multiple sclerosis, with and without a history of optic neuritis.
    Janáky M; Jánossy Á; Horváth G; Benedek G; Braunitzer G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 134(3):185-193. PubMed ID: 28421377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis].
    Paty J; Brenot P; Henry P; Faure JM
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1976 Sep; 132(9):605-21. PubMed ID: 996388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The value of brain stem auditory, visual and somatosensory evoked potentials and blink reflexes in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Kjaer M
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1980 Oct; 62(4):220-36. PubMed ID: 7211173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis?
    Di Maggio G; Santangelo R; Guerrieri S; Bianco M; Ferrari L; Medaglini S; Rodegher M; Colombo B; Moiola L; Chieffo R; Del Carro U; Martinelli V; Comi G; Leocani L
    Mult Scler; 2014 Sep; 20(10):1342-7. PubMed ID: 24591532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.
    Asselman P; Chadwick DW; Marsden DC
    Brain; 1975 Jun; 98(2):261-82. PubMed ID: 1148819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.
    Hennerici M; Wenzel D; Freund HJ
    Brain; 1977 Mar; 100 Pt 1():119-36. PubMed ID: 861711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prolonged follow-up of abnormal visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: evidence for delayed recovery.
    Matthews WB; Small M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1983 Jul; 46(7):639-42. PubMed ID: 6886701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Visual evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis and retrobulbar neuritis].
    Cendrowski W
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1977; 11(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 339118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolution of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis.
    Heinrichs IH; McLean DR
    Can J Neurol Sci; 1988 Nov; 15(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 3208223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Visual evoked potentials (VEP's) obtained by black and white or red and black checkerboard inversion. Results in healthy subjects and in multilocular sclerosis patients].
    Mauguiere F; Brudon F
    Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin; 1984 Jun; 14(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 6463311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.