These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Pibarot P; Honos GN; Durand LG; Dumesnil JG Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 8608457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stented xenograft hemodynamic function in the aortic position. Walther T; Lehmann S; Falk V; Metz S; Doll N; Rastan A; Viehweg M; Richter M; Gummert J; Mohr FW Circulation; 2004 Sep; 110(11 Suppl 1):II74-8. PubMed ID: 15364842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter. Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience. David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-year results after aortic valve replacement with the CryoLife-O'Brien Stentless Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis. Martinovic I; Farah I; Everlien M; Lindemann S; Knez I; Wittlinger T; Greve H; Vogt P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 130(3):777-82. PubMed ID: 16153928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David T; J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type. Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Pohl A; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):450-5; discussion 455. PubMed ID: 15740954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position. Grunkemeier GL; Bodnar E J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jan; 4(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7742990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves. Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]