These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7424036)

  • 21. [The optimum combination in size and type of the prosthetic valves in the combined aortic and mitral valve replacement (author's transl)].
    Kitamura N
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1977 Jul; 25(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 925436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A method of determining the feedback resistance of artificial heart valves].
    Zaiko VM; Lupachev SP; Volyntsev PA; Dolgopolov RV
    Med Tekh; 1989; (1):30-2. PubMed ID: 2739545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Open aortic bioprosthesis at zero pressure. A new concept in glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue valve.
    Imamura E; Wada J
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1980; 21(5):617-24. PubMed ID: 7451570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock-modified orifice bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Levin FH; Buckley MJ; Austen WG
    Circulation; 1978 Sep; 58(3 Pt 2):I33-5. PubMed ID: 14740674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
    Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparative studies of in vitro pulsatile flow characteristics with prosthetic heart valves (author's transl)].
    Störmer B; Mendling W; Köhler J; Kivelitz H; Kremer K; Staib W
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1974 Dec; 22(6):612-21. PubMed ID: 4548972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of results using "freestyle" stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis with cryopreserved aortic allograft.
    Kon ND; Cordell AR; Adair SM; Kitzman DW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):69-73. PubMed ID: 10660169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves.
    Butany J; Leask R
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of eight prosthetic aortic valves in a cadaver model.
    Youdelman BA; Hirose H; Jain H; Kresh JY; Entwistle JW; Wechsler AS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 134(6):1526-32. PubMed ID: 18023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root.
    Walther T; Falk V; Diegeler A; Autschbach R; Gummert J; Baryalei M; Mohr FW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Small aortic root in the elderly: use of stentless bioprosthesis.
    Sintek CF; Fletcher AD; Khonsari S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S308-13. PubMed ID: 8953459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.