These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7424561)
1. Modification of grey scale in computer tomographic images. Hemmingsson A; Jung B Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1980; 21(2A):253-5. PubMed ID: 7424561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics and control of contrast in CT. Barnes JE Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 1636042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance. Judy PF; Swensson RG J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 May; 4(5):954-65. PubMed ID: 3598747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Window width as a dosage-relevant factor in high-contrast structures in CT]. Husstedt H; Prokop M; Becker H Rofo; 1998 Feb; 168(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 9519045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. Saunders RS; Samei E Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system. Burgess A Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography. Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase-contrast digital tomosynthesis. Hammonds JC; Price RR; Donnelly EF; Pickens DR Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2353-8. PubMed ID: 21776769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard-dose vs low-dose attenuation correction CT on image quality and positron emission tomographic attenuation correction. Krishnasetty V; Bonab AA; Fischman AJ; Halpern EF; Aquino SL J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18359446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls in urinary stone identification using CT attenuation values: are we getting the same information on different scanner models? Grosjean R; Daudon M; Chammas MF; Claudon M; Eschwege P; Felblinger J; Hubert J Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1201-6. PubMed ID: 23601294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]