These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7424931)

  • 1. Comparison of six methods of preparing piggyback doses of cephalothin sodium.
    Dreiman RK
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Oct; 37(10):1342-6. PubMed ID: 7424931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of six methods for preparing cefazolin sodium for intermittent injection.
    Markowsky SJ; Kitrenos JG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Oct; 40(10):1653-8. PubMed ID: 6638027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and efficiency of three methods of preparing piggyback admixtures.
    Fraterrigo CC; Jorgenson JA
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Nov; 39(11):1920-3. PubMed ID: 7148860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering cefazolin sodium small-volume injections.
    Smith TF; Kitrenos JG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Aug; 43(8):1930-5. PubMed ID: 3752132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost comparison of two systems for intermittent intravenous administration of small-volume injections.
    Reilly RT; Strand LM; Bair JN
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Feb; 42(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 3976678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mass reconstitution of neutral cephalothin sodium using tandem sequence filling.
    Upton JH; Crouch JB; Williams HM
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1975 Jun; 32(6):579-82. PubMed ID: 1155468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time and cost comparison of four methods of filling piggyback bottles.
    Pohorylo EM; Lewis EM; Anderson ER
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jan; 40(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 6823995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time and cost comparison of four methods of filling drug manufacturers' piggyback bottles.
    Anderson ER; Soares MS
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 May; 42(5):1083-6. PubMed ID: 4003420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering small-volume injections.
    Smith CF; Amen RJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Sep; 45(9):1896-901. PubMed ID: 3228122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of using premixed frozen versus hospital-reconstituted cefazolin sodium injection.
    Havlovic DA; Ivey MF; Grotzinger RP
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Apr; 44(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 3578311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost comparison of intravenous cimetidine delivery systems.
    Jackson CW; Caldwell RD; Arford PD
    Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 25(12):1085-9. PubMed ID: 10108250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost analysis of parenteral nutrition regimens in the intensive care unit: three-compartment bag system vs multibottle system.
    Menne R; Adolph M; Brock E; Schneider H; Senkal M
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2008; 32(6):606-12. PubMed ID: 18974238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A financial evaluation of the Becton Dickinson 360 infuser system.
    Fiorenzo VJ; Kelly WN
    Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jun; 22(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 10312122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new batch method of preparing intravenous piggyback solutions in polyvinylchloride containers.
    Levy R; Kleinberg M; Lee P
    Hosp Pharm; 1980 Oct; 15(10):504-6. PubMed ID: 10309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined volume control set-piggyback system for intermittent intravenous therapy.
    Paxinos J; Samuels TM
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1975 Sep; 32(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 1190244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medication cart-filling time, accuracy, and cost with an automated dispensing system.
    Klein EG; Santora JA; Pascale PM; Kitrenos JG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 May; 51(9):1193-6. PubMed ID: 8042638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative costs of various preserved artificial tear solutions for the treatment of dry eye conditions.
    Enzenauer RW; Kao A; Williams T; Lambert RW
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 14555900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recycled unused piggyback admixtures through the use of tamper-proof safety caps.
    Jennings RH; Schad RF; Kaurich J
    Hosp Pharm; 1982 Dec; 17(12):643-5, 652. PubMed ID: 10257924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the pump syringe method with other methods for adding potassium chloride to Travenol large-volume parenterals.
    Moeller KA; Clyne KE
    Hosp Pharm; 1980 Dec; 15(12):605-7. PubMed ID: 10249421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unit-of-use versus traditional intravenous piggyback drug administration systems.
    Tribble DA; Fotis M; McDonald DE
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Jun; 36(6):739, 742. PubMed ID: 111545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.