These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7425951)

  • 1. Improved contingent negative variation audiometry.
    Prevec TS; Ribarić K
    Audiology; 1980; 19(6):457-68. PubMed ID: 7425951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contingent negative variation audiometry in children.
    Prevec TS; Ribaric K; Butinar D
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):114-26. PubMed ID: 6704053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A possible masking effect of tinnitus. Evaluation of CNV audiometry.
    Hosoda Y; Ushiro K; Doi T; Kumazawa T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1993; 500():23-5. PubMed ID: 8452017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Basis and clinical application of the "contingent negative variation" in "evoked response audiometry" (author's transl)].
    Brix R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Jan; 87(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1130075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of light touch perception threshold by contingent negative variation.
    Prevec TS; Berić A
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 84(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 1864334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of CNV in audiometry.
    Prevec TS; Lokar J; Cernelc S
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):447-57. PubMed ID: 4416577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evoked cerebral potential audiometry and hearing threshold.
    Prevec TS; Cernelc S; Ribaric K
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1252189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold.
    Mason SM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):277-96. PubMed ID: 6732632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.
    Lightfoot G; Kennedy V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 16957496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The importance of the "contingent negative variation" (CNV) for audiometry (author's transl)].
    Brix R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1977 Aug; 217(3):273-87. PubMed ID: 579084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of slow vertex response audiometry in young children with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Suzuki T; Taguchi K; Yoda M
    Audiology; 1979; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 435172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards fully objective evoked response audiometry.
    McClelland RJ; Sayers BM
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Nov; 17(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 6667359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring expectation of pain: Contingent negative variation in placebo and nocebo effects.
    Piedimonte A; Guerra G; Vighetti S; Carlino E
    Eur J Pain; 2017 May; 21(5):874-885. PubMed ID: 28106308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of motor-response-deprivation on contingent negative variation (CNV). I: Normal adult data.
    Nakamura M; Fukui Y; Kadobayashi I; Katoh N
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1975; 29(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 1232042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of the CNV audiometry method.
    Prevec TS; Cernelc S
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):168-75. PubMed ID: 1215707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry.
    Black RC; Clark GM; O'Leary SJ; Walters C
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():5-17. PubMed ID: 6316713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal statistics in objective auditory evoked potential (AEP) detection by the phase spectral method.
    Ross AJ; Beagley HA; Sayers BM
    J Biomed Eng; 1980 Oct; 2(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 7464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.