BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 742596)

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of a recording respirable mass monitor.
    Volkwein JC; Behum PT
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 742596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the GCA respirable dust monitor 101-1.
    Marple VA; Rubow KL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 39(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 204180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of RDM-201 Respirable Dust Monitor.
    Samimi B
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Jun; 47(6):354-9. PubMed ID: 3739904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of mass concentrations determined with personal respirable coal mine dust samplers operating at 1.2 liters per minute and the Casella 113A gravimetric sampler (MRE).
    Treaftis HN; Gero AJ; Kacsmar PM; Tomb TF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Dec; 45(12):826-32. PubMed ID: 6517028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of respirable coal mine dust concentrations measured with an MRE and a newly-developed, two-stage impactor sampler.
    Treaftis HN; Tomb TF; Taylor CD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Nov; 39(11):891-7. PubMed ID: 736001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critique of 1985 ACGIH report on particle size-selective sampling in the workplace.
    Bartley DL; Doemeny LJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Aug; 47(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 3751894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personal sampling impactor with respirable aerosol penetration characteristics.
    Marple VA; McCormack JE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):916-22. PubMed ID: 6660192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of recommended respirable mass dust sampling devices.
    Thompson EM; Treaftis HN; Tomb TF; Beckert AJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Oct; 38(10):523-35. PubMed ID: 920601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational exposure to cotton dust in cottonseed oil mills.
    Tabak S; Broday DM; Tabak I; Manor G
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Feb; 17(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 11843198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation and field calibration of the Miniram PDM-3 aerosol monitor for measuring respirable and total coal dust.
    Middendorf PJ; Lehocky AH; Williams PL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(4):502-11. PubMed ID: 10462784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure to dust and its particle size distribution in shoe manufacture and repair workplaces measured with GRIMM laser dust monitor.
    Stroszejn-Mrowca G; Szadkowska-StaƄczyk I
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2003; 16(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 14964641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dust generator for laboratory use.
    Marple VA; Liu BY; Rubow KL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 39(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 204181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new two-stage respirable dust sampler.
    Tomb TF; Treaftis HN
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 1111262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory evaluation of pressure differential-based respirable dust detector tube.
    Volkwein JC; Schoeneman AL; Page SJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jan; 15(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 10712071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new mass sensor for respirable dust measurement.
    Sem GJ; Tsurubayashi K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Nov; 36(11):791-800. PubMed ID: 1211342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.